Search Results for "Probation completion"

481 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 481 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision as Infructuous in Probation Case Due to Completion of Probation Period. Non-Compliance with Condition Precedent of Probation Officer Report Under Section 4(2) of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 Held Not to Warrant Interference After Full Execution of Order.

The revision applicant, Rameshwar s/o Pralhad Sarode, challenged the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, in Criminal Appeal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Discharge of Probationer Caretaker for Unsatisfactory Performance. Probationer's services terminated after multiple extensions of probation period due to unsatisfactory performance; court held that no inquiry is required before discharge during probation.

The petitioner, Sanjoy Datta, was appointed as a caretaker on probation for two years by the Central Board for Workers Education (Board) vide order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Discharge of Probationary Police Constable for Unsatisfactory Service During Probation Period. Termination under Rule 6(2) of Karnataka Civil Services (Probation) Rules, 1977 is valid when based on overall performance assessment and not punitive.

The petitioner, Sri. Sayad Imamsab Chimamad, was appointed as a Reserve Police Constable and was on probation. During his probation period, his servic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Writ Petition Seeking Confirmation After 6 Years Probation. Court Applies UGC Regulations, 2018 Clause 11.3 and Precedent in State of Punjab v. Dharam Singh to Hold Probationer Deemed Confirmed, Directing Management to Issue Confirmation Order.

The case involved a writ petition filed by an Assistant Professor seeking confirmation in her post after nearly seven years of probation. The employer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Probationary District Judge for Unsatisfactory Performance. Termination under Rule 13(4)(ii)(b) of Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008 is valid and not stigmatic.

The petitioner, Smt. Smita Rajendra Kadu, was appointed as a District Judge (direct recruitment) under the Maharashtra Judicial Service Rules, 2008. S...