Search Results for "Primary Liability"

1032 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1032 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Grievous Injuries in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.47,592/- Enhanced to Rs.1,00,000/- Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimant's Medical Expenses and Pain and Suffering Considered for Just Compensation.

The appellant, Solanki Dipakbhai Babubhai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of Rs.2,00,0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Initiation of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Despite Payment by Guarantor's Resolution Applicant. Right of Subrogation Under Section 140 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Not Available Where Resolution Plan Extinguishes Guarantee and No Payment of Entire Debt.

The case involves an appeal against the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the 2nd respondent, Gujarat Hydrocarbon a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Deposit Water Charges Arrears Under Order XV-A CPC in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Consent Terms and Lease Deed Interpretation Confirm Tenant's Liability for Water Charges Despite Claim of Lessor's Responsibility.

The petitioners, Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri and others, challenged the judgment and order dated 12 July 2021 passed by the Appellate Bench of Small...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Reinstates Proceedings Quashed by High Court. Parallel Prosecutions Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Other Offences Are Permissible, and Settlement Agreement Does Not Extinguish Liability Unless Full Payment Is Made.

The dispute arose from dishonoured cheques issued by Aanchal Cement Limited (ACL) to Gimpex Private Limited. Gimpex had paid customs duty and wharfage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 43B(f) of Income Tax Act — Leave Encashment Deduction Allowed Only on Actual Payment. Clause (f) is not arbitrary or violative of Article 14 as it serves a legitimate purpose of preventing abuse and ensuring employee welfare.

The Supreme Court in this appeal considered the constitutional validity of clause (f) of Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was inserted b...