Search Results for "Penalty and Interest"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Penalty and Interest"

2905 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2905 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurer's Appeal in Employee's Compensation Insurance Dispute — Security Guard Not Covered by Private Contract Policy. Insurer Not Liable to Pay Compensation as Policy Covered Only Cleaners and Supervisors, and Pay and Recovery Principle Under Section 147 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Not Applicable to Independent Private Insurance Contract Under Employee's Compensation Act, 1923.

9 Apr 2025

The judgment under review arose from a first appeal filed before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad by an insurance company challenging an award of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Section 15J Factors Illustrative in SEBI Penalty Adjudication. Adjudicating Officer Retains Discretion to Consider Mitigating Circumstances Beyond Stipulated Factors Under SEBI Act.

28 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a reference arising from multiple civil appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 15J of the Securities ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Considers Revenue's Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Quashing Penalty Notices Under Section 271DA on Limitation Grounds. Issue Pertains to Interpretation of Section 275 of Income Tax Act in Cases Where Penalty Is to Be Imposed by an Authority Other Than the Assessing Officer.

7 Jul 2026

The appeals arose from orders passed by a single judge of the High Court of Karnataka in ten writ petitions. The respondents, individual assessees and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Strict Compliance Required for Reduced Penalty Under Section 11AC. The benefit of 25% penalty is available only if duty, interest and reduced penalty are paid within 30 days of the original adjudication order, not the Tribunal's order.

25 Jun 2012

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Writ Petition Challenging Penalty Order Passed Under Section 271D of Income Tax Act, 1961. The Penalty Was Imposed for Alleged Violation of Section 269SS Regarding Cash Loans.

25 Feb 2025

...

High Court

CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 100 OF 2012

29 Jan 2016

...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 17 OF 2004

9 Aug 2010

The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed by international airlines—Malaysian Airlines, Saudi Arabian Airlines, North West Airlines, and Ke...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Assessee's Belated Challenge to Penalty Notice in Income Tax Appeal; Court Examines Whether 30-Year-Old Defect in Notice Under Section 271(1)(c) Can Vitiate Penalty Absent Prejudice. The court focused on the threshold test of factual prejudice and whether a technical plea not raised before lower forums can be urged in a Section 260A appeal.

11 Jan 2024

The appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income-tax...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Revenue Appeal Against ITAT Order Deleting Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Assessment Year 2006-07 Due to Defective Notice; Questions Validity of Penalty Initiation Despite Retrospective Amendment to Section 271(1B)

17 Mar 2023

The appeal before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, arose from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru, which had allowed ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against High Court Judgment Dismissing Challenge to Arbitral Award in Bill Discounting Dispute — Contractual Interest Rate of 36% Per Annum with Monthly Rests Upheld. High Court's Upholding of Arbitral Award on Interest Rate Based on Mutual Agreement Between Commercial Parties and Not Opposed to Public Policy.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a bill discounting facility extended by the respondent to a seller (BDDL) and buyer (appellant) of goods. The appellant and BDD...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)