Search Results for "Panchayat President"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Panchayat President"

205 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 205 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Executive Officer's Appellate Order in Grama Panchayat Property Dispute — Khata Change Directed Based on Possession and Revenue Records. The Court held that the Grama Panchayat cannot refuse khata change when the applicant is in possession and has valid revenue entries, and the Executive Officer's appellate order under Section 269 of the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is binding.

30 Aug 2021

The dispute pertains to property bearing Khata No.160 measuring East-West 150 feet and North-South 100 feet situated in K.R.Sagara, Belagola Hobli, Sr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Zilla Panchayat Review Order in Property Dispute — President Lacks Statutory Power to Review Own Orders Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Review Order Dated 22-02-2014 Set Aside as Void Ab Initio for Absence of Express Statutory Provision.

15 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Sri U.V. Sridhar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal of Gram Panchayat President Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion Invalid as Notice Did Not Specify Meeting Date and Time Under Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. The court held that the mandatory requirement of specifying date and time in the notice was not complied with, rendering the no-confidence motion invalid.

8 Feb 2019

The appellant, Smt. Gopemma, was the President of Gram Panchayat Nirna. Certain members of the Gram Panchayat issued a notice of no-confidence motion ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Gram Panchayat President Despite Pending Disqualification Proceedings. No Statutory Bar Exists Under Section 3(3) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 for Moving No-Confidence Motion During Pendency of Disqualification Proceedings.

13 Jun 2024

The appellant, P. Reethi Mune Gowda, was the President of Bagaluru Grama Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was moved against her by several members of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

9 Oct 2014

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Parity for Grampanchayat Employees with State Government Employees. Grampanchayat Employees Not Entitled to Same Benefits as State Government Employees Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

9 May 2014

The petitioners, Maharashtra Rajya Grampanchayat Karmachari Mahasangh, a registered union of Grampanchayat employees, filed a writ petition seeking di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

24 Jan 2014

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Grama Panchayat Delimitation Notification — No Violation of Natural Justice Found in Final Notification Process. Delimitation of Wards Under Section 5 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is a Legislative Function Not Requiring Hearing Before Final Notification.

20 Sep 2021

The petitioners, residents of various Grama Panchayats in Mangaluru Taluk, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act Case — State Government's Appellate Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Violates Section 39(3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

29 Apr 2026

The Petitioner, Mangal Mahadu Korde, was elected as Sarpanch of Wakalwadi Village Panchayat in 2021. Respondent No.5, a member of the Panchayat, lodge...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Petition of Nominated Councilors in Municipal Election Dispute — Voting Rights Upheld Under Section 42(2) of Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964. Nominated councilors are entitled to vote in election for President/Vice President as they are deemed councilors under the Act.

18 Apr 2022

The petitioners, four nominated councilors of Malur Town Municipal Council, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chall...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)