Search Results for "Palekar Award"

15 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Orders in Newspaper Employee Reinstatement Cases — Held that Workmen are Entitled to Reinstatement with Continuity of Service and Back Wages for Unfair Labour Practices Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by Lokmat Media Private Limited (formerly Lokmat Newspapers Private Limited) challenging orders ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Newspaper Company Challenging Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice. Employer's Failure to Implement Bachhawat Award and Deny Permanency to Workman Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 5, 7, and 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s. Lokmat Newspapers Private Limited, a registered company publishing daily newspapers from Nagpur, challenged the judgment and orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition by Employer in Industrial Dispute — Upholds Dismissal of Workman After Fair Domestic Enquiry. Labour Court's Interference Set Aside as Enquiry Was Proper and Punishment Not Disproportionate Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Chloride India Ltd. (now Exide Industries Ltd.), challenged the Award dated 19.9.1995 passed by the IInd Labour Court, Pune in Referen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award Denying Reinstatement of Workman. Domestic Inquiry Held Fair and Punishment of Dismissal Upheld as Not Disproportionate Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Maharashtra General Kamgar Union, a registered trade union, challenged the Award dated 8th April 1994 (Part-I) and Award dated 7th Apr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Remission for Prisoner Who Escaped from Open Prison. Rule 22(i) of Maharashtra Prisons (Remission System) Rules, 1962 held not violative of Article 14 as it applies uniformly to all prisoners who escape or attempt to escape.

The petitioner, Shalik Maruti Kowe, was convicted for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code on 23 June 1997 and sentenced to life imprison...