Search Results for "Order XXXIX"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Order XXXIX"

163 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Application Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC for Alleged Violation of Injunction Order. Court holds that mere filing of a suit for permanent injunction does not automatically establish willful disobedience of an interim order without proof of specific notice and deliberate defiance.

23 Feb 2021

The appellants, who were plaintiffs in a suit for permanent injunction, filed an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC alleging that the responden...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in CPC Case — Sets Aside Order Dismissing Application Under Order XXXIX Rule 2-A for Non-Prosecution. Restoration of Application Granted as Plaintiff Was Not Given Sufficient Opportunity to Be Heard.

5 Oct 2021

The appellant, Shantinath, was the plaintiff in O.S.No.306/2007 pending before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Indi. He filed an interlocutory applic...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petitions Challenging Maintainability of Appeal Under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC. Court Holds That Appeal Under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC Lies Against Orders Under Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC, Including Those Not Expressly Granting or Refusing Injunction.

8 Mar 2018

The petitioners, Augusto T. D'Souza and Ana D'Souza, filed writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging an order dated 01/12/2012 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Application to Set Aside Dismissal of Appeal for Non-Compliance of Order to Bring Legal Representatives on Record. Order XXXIX Rule 11 CPC Held Inapplicable to Dismissal for Default; Sufficient Cause Not Shown Under Order XLI Rule 17 CPC.

14 Nov 2014

The appellants, original defendants in a suit for damages, filed Regular Civil Appeal against the decree granting damages to the respondents. During t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit Challenging Compromise Decree. Interpretation of Kachhi Properties Judgment Clarified: No Automatic Stay of Execution Proceedings Upon Filing of Suit for Declaration that Decree is Void.

8 Apr 2011

The Bombay High Court heard two appeals from orders rejecting temporary injunction applications. The first appeal (AO 884/2010) challenged an order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Involving 'Ankur' Mark — Plaintiff Establishes Prima Facie Case of Passing Off and Likelihood of Confusion. The court held that the defendants' use of the identical mark 'Ankur' for identical goods constitutes infringement and passing off under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

10 Nov 2025

The plaintiff, Innovations Garment Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendants, Bhavesh Ramjibhai Gada a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Decision to Frame Preliminary Issue on Jurisdiction in Money Recovery Suits. Court holds that Order XIV Rule 2 CPC allows framing of preliminary issue on jurisdiction even if it involves mixed questions of law and fact.

22 Feb 2013

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in five separate Special Civil Suits for recovery of money and paintings, challenged an order dated 11.06.2012 pa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Striking Out of Defence for Non-Payment of Interim Maintenance in DV Act Case. Failure to Pay Maintenance Justifies Coercive Measure Under Section 23 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

28 Jun 2019

The petitioner, Girish Vijaysingh Pardeshi, challenged an order dated 31/03/2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No. 7, J...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal Against Dismissal of Petition and Striking Out of Defence Under Order XXXIX Rule 11 CPC. Non-Compliance with Access Orders Disputed; Video Evidence and Counsellor Report Considered.

9 Dec 2014

The appellant wife filed Family Court Appeal No.20 of 2013 challenging the order dated 8th November 2012 passed by the Family Court at Mumbai. By that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Appoints Court Receiver in Property Dispute Between Family Members Over Sonal Building and Flat No.3A. Court Receiver appointed under Order XL CPC for building and flat, with power to appoint agent for use on payment of compensation.

30 Sep 2005

The present Notice of Motion was taken out by the plaintiff, Rohit Vanmalidas Mehta, in a suit pending before the Bombay High Court. The dispute perta...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)