Search Results for "Old Land Acquisition Act 1894"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Old Land Acquisition Act 1894"

171 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 171 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Compensation and Betterment Charges for CIDCO Metro Project. Court upholds compensation determined under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and rejects waiver of betterment charges under CIDCO Act.

4 Mar 2025

The judgment pertains to a group of five writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for the Metro Centre project of CIDCO in Panvel,...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Under Resettlement Act — Acquisition Upheld as Possession Vested in Government and Section 48(1) Application Rejected. Court Held That Once Possession Is Taken and Award Is Passed, Government Cannot Withdraw Land From Acquisition Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

25 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Ashok Shantinath Chougule, as legal heir of his deceased father Shantinath Dada Chougule, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Acquisition Cases — Non-Grant of Solatium and Interest Upheld. The Court held that Section 3J of the National Highways Act, 1956, excluding solatium and interest under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

3 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), considered the validity of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Land Acquisition for Pimpri-Chinchwad New Town Development Authority — Compensation Enhancement Granted. Landowners entitled to higher compensation under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for acquisitions under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

7 Aug 2019

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by landowners and a developer challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Pimpri-Chinch...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Compliance with KIADB Act. Acquisition for Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board fails as the Board is not an industrial concern under Section 2(7) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

15 Dec 2016

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Amani Bellandur Khane Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, challenged the preliminary notifi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pune Municipal Corporation's Revision Against Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement. Reference Court's enhancement of compensation upheld as based on evidence and within its jurisdiction under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

30 Nov -0001

The Pune Municipal Corporation filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions for Agricultural Land in Nagpur — Held That Market Value Must Be Determined Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Based on Potential Use and Comparable Sales. The court directed reassessment of compensation considering industrial potential and comparable sales.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners from Takalghat, Hingna, Nagpur, challenging the compensation awarded by the Spe...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Award — Petitioners Fail to Establish Entitlement to Higher Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the Reference Court's findings on market value based on evidence cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction unless perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a writ petition filed by seven individuals (petitioners) against the State of Goa, the Land Acquisition Officer, and eight private r...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)