Search Results for "Moreshwar Bhalchandra Deshpande"

8 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Invalidation Pension Due to Delay and Laches. Sepoy-Driver's Disability Claim Rejected as Not Attributable to Military Service.

The petitioner, Moreshwar Bhalchandra Deshpande, joined the Indian Army as a Sepoy-Driver on 4th February 1981 and was posted in difficult terrains in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Ex-Airman's Claim for Invalid Pension Despite Less Than 10 Years Service Because Psychiatric Disorder Was Service-Related. Court Follows Precedent Where Pension Was Granted for Service-Related Psychiatric Disorder Even With Less Than 5 Years Service.

Background: The petitioner, an ex-airman discharged from the Indian Air Force, filed Writ Petition No. 2761 of 1997 before the Nagpur Bench of the Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court's Order Allowing Production of Documents Under Order XIII Rule 3(1)(a) CPC — Documents Cannot Be Reserved for Cross-Examination of a Party. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration after hearing both sides.

The petitioner, Purushottam Shankar Ghodgaonkar, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 7 July 2011 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Divisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Municipal Land — Held That No Notice Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act Is Required for Unauthorized Occupants and That Encroachment on Public Land Cannot Be Regularized.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by different groups of petitioners challenging the demolition of their constructions on land belonging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Failure to Prove Joint Family Property and Adverse Possession. Concurrent findings of fact upheld as plaintiff admitted sale deed and failed to establish title or possession within limitation.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of suit property claiming it to be joint family property. The ...