Search Results for "Misbranding"

14 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Revision Petitioner in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by M. Ajithkumar, the proprietor of Swasthik Trading Company, challenging his conviction under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Compensation for Defective Cotton Seeds — Procedural Lapses Not Fatal When Defect Not Disputed. Compensation Upheld but Interest Reduced from 24% to 12% Under Maharashtra Cotton Seeds Act, 2009 and Rules, 2010.

The petitioner, M/s Bayer Bio Science Private Limited, a seed manufacturing company, challenged an order dated 29 December 2011 passed by the Commissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Respondents Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act Due to Lack of Mandatory Enquiry Under Section 202 CrPC -- Misbranding Allegations Fail on Jurisdictional Grounds

The Supreme Court addressed criminal appeals arising from a complaint under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, alleging misbranding of a vaccine by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seed Inspector's Entry and Seizure Without Authorization Under Seeds Act, 1966. Entry and seizure of seeds from storage area without prior authorization under Section 14 of Seeds Act, 1966 held illegal and without jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of research, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Section 11 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 and Rule 14 of PFA Rules Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Sri. Syed Ahammed, was the accused in Criminal Case No.1022/2008 before the Civil Judge and JMFC, Sakaleshpura, for an offence under t...