Search Results for "Minor mineral"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Minor mineral"

211 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 211 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner in Writ Challenging Seizure of Vehicle for Transporting Gitti; Holds Gitti is Minor Mineral Requiring Royalty and Transit Pass under Maharashtra Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, 2013. Transportation Without Valid Secondary Transport Pass and GPS Justifies Seizure and Penalty, and Petitioner's Lack of Clean Hands Bars Relief.

28 Jul 2026

The petitioner, a transporter, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, aggrieved by the sei...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Royalty on Ordinary Earth — Notification Dated 03.02.2000 Declared Ultra Vires. Ordinary Earth Not a Mineral Under Section 3(e) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

20 Jun 2017

The petitioners, M/s. Utkal Highways and others, were partnership firms engaged in excavation of ordinary earth. They challenged the notification date...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Royalty Dispute Over Brick Earth Extraction — Ownership Presumption Under Section 42 of Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 and Royalty Levy Under Mines and Mineral (Regulations and Development) Act, 1957 Upheld. The Court held that royalty on minor minerals is leviable irrespective of land ownership and that the High Court erred in decreeing the suit without considering the presumption of ownership in favour of the State.

20 Feb 2025

The State of Punjab and its officers appealed against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which had decreed the suits filed by brick kil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Royalty Demand on Excavated Earth from Metro Project. Excavated earth from underground metro construction not 'minor mineral' under Notification dated 3 February 2000; no royalty payable.

8 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Tata Projects Limited, a member of a consortium executing the Mumbai Metro Underground Project, filed a writ petition under Article 22...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Stone Crusher Operators' Writ Petitions Challenging Requirement of E-Auction for Short Term Permits Under Maharashtra Minor Mineral Rules; Holds Rule 59 Permits Grant on Application Without Auction.

17 Mar 2022

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court by several stone crusher operators. They challenged the refusal o...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Stone Crusher's Petition Against Closure of Mining Lease Account. Court holds that partnership firm is entitled to continue quarry lease operations under Gujarat Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2017 despite change in constitution of firm.

20 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Shiv Stone Crusher, a partnership firm, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and under the...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Authorization Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Petitioner Had Valid Development Permission and No Mining Intent. Excavation of ordinary earth as part of construction project does not attract royalty or penalty under Section 48(7) of MLRC if done under valid development permission.

8 Mar 2024

The petitioner, AIGP Developers (Pune) Private Limited, challenged an order dated 29 June 2023 passed by the Tehsildar, Haveli (Pune), under Section 4...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 by Mining Lessees. Rule requiring prior approval for transfer of mining leases for minerals not in First Schedule to MMDR Act held intra vires and not inconsistent with Section 10A(2)(c) of Amendment Act 2015.

1 Dec 2016

The petitioners, holders of mining leases for minerals not specified in the First Schedule to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Demand of Contribution to District Mineral Foundation Under Rule 45(1A) of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 — Rule Held Ultra Vires the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The court quashed demands for DMF contribution as a condition for mineral dispatch, ruling that Rule 45(1A) is beyond the rule-making power under Section 15 of the MMDR Act.

7 Apr 2022

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by mining lessees challenging the demand for contribution to the District Mineral Foundation (DMF) und...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)