Search Results for "Manifestly Unjust Award"

55 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Assignee Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Assignment of Contractual Rights and Arbitration Agreement Valid Under Sudanese Law; Respondent's Public Policy Challenge Rejected.

The petitioner, Neilan International Co Ltd, a Sudanese company, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitral award dated 27 September 2018 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Construction of World's Highest Railway Bridge. Division Bench's Interference with Concurrent Findings of Arbitral Tribunal and Single Judge Set Aside for Exceeding Section 37 Scope.

The appeal arises from a dispute between Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (appellant) and Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking (respondent) concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Time-Barred Counterclaim in Arbitration. Limitation for Counterclaim Runs from Date of Termination of Contract, Not from Subsequent Correspondence.

The appeal arose from an order dated 1 October 2012 passed by a learned Single Judge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, d...