Search Results for "Mamlatdar's Courts Act delegation"

8 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Additional Commissioner's Orders in Gram Panchayat Disqualification Appeals. Delegation of Powers Under Section 13(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Remains Valid Despite Amendment to Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Amitkumar Bankar, challenged orders of the Additional Commissioner dated 18.01.2023 that set aside the Collector's disqualification of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench Adjudicates Regular First Appeal in Partition Suit Concerning Re-granted Walikaraki Lands Under KVOA Act. Core Issue: Junior Family Members’ Entitlement to Share in Lands Re-granted to Senior Branch After Abolition of Village Office.

The dispute pertains to a suit for partition filed by the respondents/plaintiffs against the appellants/defendants regarding agricultural lands and ho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Sub-Divisional Officer's Order in Mamlatdar's Courts Revision; Holds No Jurisdiction to Delegate Power to SDO. Collector Cannot Delegate Revisionary Powers to Sub-Divisional Officer Under Section 23(2A), Only to Assistant/Deputy Collector or Assistant Commissioner.

In a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners challenged the order dated 3 March 2014 passed by the Sub-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Sub-Divisional Officer's Revision Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906. Sub-Divisional Officer Not Authorized to Exercise Revisional Powers Under Section 23(2) of the Act.

The petitioner, Bija Maroti Hatwar, filed an application under Section 5 of the Mamlatdars' Courts Act, 1906, seeking to restrain respondent no.1 from...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entries in Revenue Records — Revenue Entries Do Not Confer Title, Civil Suit Is Proper Remedy.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer ...