Search Results for "Maharashtra Fragmentation Act"

81 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 81 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Cancellation of Revenue Entry in Fragmentation Case — Sale Deed Not Void Ab Initio. Revenue Authorities Cannot Cancel Entries After 17 Years Without Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Under Gujarat Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947.

The petitioners, Kantibhai Bhagwanbhai Narola and others, purchased agricultural land bearing Revenue Survey No. 651 admeasuring 1 Acre 6 Gunthas and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entry Correction in Land Records — Correction of Survey Numbers in Mutation Entries Does Not Require Notice to Parties Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, Jibhau Sukhdev Deore and others, filed a writ petition challenging the correction of survey numbers in mutation entries by the revenu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Records Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioners Failed to Establish Possession or Title Over Disputed Land, and Alternative Remedy of Civil Suit Was Available Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, Jibhau Sukhdev Deore and others, filed a writ petition challenging the mutation entry made in the revenue records in favor of respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit Based on Registered Sale Deed — Title Not Extinguished by Subsequent Mutation or Revenue Entries. Registered sale deed confers absolute title and possession; subsequent revenue entries or mutation do not affect title unless set aside by competent court.

The appeal arises from a suit for possession filed by the plaintiff-appellant (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 44(1)(i) of Maharashtra Registration Rules, 1961 as Ultra Vires Registration Act, 1908. Circular requiring NOC from Gram Panchayat for registration of sale deeds quashed for lack of statutory authority.

The petitioners, three individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 44(1)(i) of the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Civil Courts. Petitioners failed to establish possession or title over suit lands; mutation entries held not conferring title under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners challenging mutation entries made in the revenue records in favor of the origin...