Search Results for "Maharashtra Court Fees Act"

1132 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1132 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Income Tax Matter Involving India-China DTAA Interpretation. Petitioner's Claim for NIL Withholding Tax Certificate Rejected Due to Pending Assessments and Previous Tax Determinations Under Section 197 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The dispute involved a Chinese company, Petitioner, which provided technical services to its Indian subsidiary, Benteler India Private Limited, under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Rules on Bar Council Enrolment Fees: Balancing Statutory Limits and Practical Necessities. Ensuring Accessibility and Fairness in Legal Profession Entry While Addressing Operational Costs

The judgment addresses the issue of whether the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils (SBCs) exceed the statutory limits set by Section 24(1)(f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Copra as Not Notified Agricultural Produce Under APMC Act. Explanation to Rule 32(1) of Goa APMC Rules Held Ultra Vires as Copra Not in Schedule to Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioners, Marico Industries Ltd. and Jude Linhares, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the demand for market...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled Through Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Court Holds That Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Does Not Mandate Refund Upon Settlement Through Alternative Dispute Resolution.

The petitioner, Sanjeevkumar Harakchand Kankariya, entered into an agreement to sell immovable property with respondents No.3 and 4. When the agreemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State to Reimburse Fees for Backward Class Students in Private Unaided Schools - State's Obligation Under Article 21-A and RTE Act

The petitions raised questions about the liability of the State to reimburse fees for elementary and secondary education to children belonging to back...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Advocate's Appeal for Legal Fees from Municipal Corporation - Held that Advocate is Entitled to Fees as per Contract and Quantum Meruit for Services Rendered.

The appellant, an advocate practicing in Nashik, filed a suit for recovery of legal fees from the Nashik Municipal Corporation (respondent No.1) and i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Unaided Private School to Fix Fees Subject to Reasonable Regulation. Fee Fixation Must Be Transparent and Not Excessive Under Grant in Aid Code and Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1987.

The petitioners, Hindi Vidya Bhavan Society and another, are a society registered under the Societies' Registration Act, 1860 and a public trust under...