Bombay High Court Directs State to Reimburse Fees for Backward Class Students in Private Unaided Schools - State's Obligation Under Article 21-A and RTE Act

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 433
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitions raised questions about the liability of the State to reimburse fees for elementary and secondary education to children belonging to backward classes and weaker sections of society. The petitioners in PIL No. 26 of 2011 were citizens belonging to Scheduled Castes, Vimukta Jati and Nomadic Tribes, and Special Backward Classes, whose wards were studying in various private unaided schools in Mumbai and were receiving freeships/scholarships provided by the Department of Social Welfare, State of Maharashtra till 2008-09. The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 1724 of 2010 was a private non-aided school seeking directions to the State Government to release the amount of fees/free-studentship for students belonging to backward classes. The court examined the Government Resolution dated 24 December 1970 which sanctioned revised rules for grant of free studentship and examination fees to such students. The court held that the State is obligated under Article 21-A and the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 to ensure free and compulsory education to children aged 6-14 years, including those in private unaided schools, and must reimburse fees for backward class students. The court directed the State to release the amounts due and ensure that schools do not prevent students from attending due to non-payment of fees.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Education - Article 21-A - State Obligation - The State is obligated to ensure free and compulsory education to children aged 6-14 years, including those in private unaided schools, and must reimburse fees for backward class students. (Paras 1-5)

B) Education Law - Reimbursement of Fees - Backward Classes - Government Resolution dated 24 December 1970 - The State Government sanctioned revised rules for grant of free studentship and examination fees to students belonging to specified backward classes studying in educational institutions in Maharashtra. (Para 5)

C) Education Law - Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 - Section 12(1)(c) - Private Unaided Schools - The Act mandates that private unaided schools admit at least 25% children from weaker sections and backward classes, and the State shall reimburse the fees. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State is liable to reimburse fees for elementary and secondary education to children belonging to backward classes and weaker sections studying in private unaided schools.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the State Government to release the amounts due for reimbursement of fees to backward class students in private unaided schools and to ensure that schools do not prevent students from attending due to non-payment of fees.

Law Points

  • Right to Education
  • Reimbursement of Fees
  • Backward Classes
  • Private Unaided Schools
  • State Obligation
  • Article 21-A
  • Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act
  • 2009
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (04) 92

PIL No. 26 of 2011; Writ Petition No. 1724 of 2010

2013-04-03

Mohit S. Shah, C.J., N.M. Jamdar, J.

Ms. Gayatri Singh with Kranti L.C. for the petitioners; Mr. C.K. Thomas for respondent Nos.1 and 4; Mr. Shirin Shaikh i/by Mr. Deepak Chitnis Chiprikar for respondent No.2; Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader with Ms. Sindha Sreedharan, Assistant Government Pleader for State-Respondent No.5; Mr. C.K. Thomas for the petitioners in WP; Mr. D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 3-State

Naresh Gangaram Gosavi and others; Shree Narayana Mandira Samiti's Shri Narayana Guru Primary and Secondary School

Chembur English School and others; State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation and Writ Petition concerning reimbursement of fees for backward class students in private unaided schools.

Remedy Sought

Directions to the State Government to ensure schools do not prevent students from attending due to non-payment of fees and to release the amount of fees/free-studentship.

Filing Reason

Non-payment of freeships/scholarships by the State to backward class students in private unaided schools after 2008-09.

Issues

Whether the State is liable to reimburse fees for elementary and secondary education to children belonging to backward classes and weaker sections studying in private unaided schools.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the State is obligated to provide free education and reimburse fees under Article 21-A and the RTE Act. Respondents argued that the State's obligation is limited to government schools.

Ratio Decidendi

The State is obligated under Article 21-A and the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 to ensure free and compulsory education to children aged 6-14 years, including those in private unaided schools, and must reimburse fees for backward class students.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitions raise interesting questions about liability of the State to reimburse fees for elementary and secondary education to children belonging to backward classes and weaker sections of the society. By Government Resolution dated 24 December, 1970 (Exhibit'A'), the State Government sanctioned the revised rules for grant of free studentship and examination fees to the students belonging to the above categories studying in the educational institutions in the State of Maharashtra.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 21-A
  • Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009: Section 12(1)(c)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Adverse Possession Case — Possessory Owner Acquires Title When Rightful Owner Fails to Assert Within Limitation Period. Onus Shifts to Plaintiff to Prove Title and Possession Within Twelve Years When Defen...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Restoration of Incentive Increment for Teacher's B.P.Ed. Degree After Government Declares Equivalence. Recovery Order Quashed and Increment Restored Pursuant to G.O.Ms.No.106 in Light of Equivalence Committee Recommendations...