Search Results for "MRTU PULP Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "MRTU PULP Act"

581 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 581 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Adjudicates Letters Patent Appeal Against Regularisation of Temporary Peon Under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971. Industrial Court Had Directed Regularisation and Payment of Wages from 02.04.1993 Despite Employer's Contention That Only One Sanctioned Post of Peon Existed and Employee's Entry Was Not Under Section 5(2) of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

30 Sep 2021

This Letters Patent Appeal arose from the dismissal of the employer's writ petition, which had challenged the Industrial Court's order directing regul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Manager in MRTU and PULP Act Case — Lack of Specific Allegations and Limitation Bar. Complaint under Section 48 of MRTU and PULP Act fails as no specific allegations of responsibility for compliance of interim order and complaint filed beyond six months.

28 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Maruti s/o Narsingrao Ladde, was the Manager (P. & A.) of Ashok Leyland Limited. The Ashok Leyland United Employees' Union, a Represen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSRTC Petition in Guarantor Recovery Dispute — Industrial Court Order Set Aside for Lack of Employer-Employee Relationship. Co-guarantor cannot claim protection under MRTU & PULP Act against employer of principal debtor as recovery action is not an unfair labour practice.

13 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and order dated 05.10.2016 of the Industrial Court, Nagp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Repatriation Order in MRTU & PULP Act Complaint. Transfer from EDP Section to Generation Side Held Not an Unfair Labour Practice as Employee Had No Right to Continue in Particular Post.

12 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Promod Singh Hanuman Singh Parihar, was employed as a Sub-Engineer/Chargeman Grade II in the Generation side of the Maharashtra State ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Rejection of Recognition Application Under MRTU and PULP Act. Industrial Court's finding that the Petitioner-Union failed to establish membership among employees of the successor company PMPML upheld.

22 Mar 2024

The Petitioner, Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Karmachari Mahasangh, a trade union, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Jurisdiction in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Cement Industry Declared Controlled Industry Under Section 2(ee) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but Delegation of Powers Under Section 39 Does Not Alter Appropriate Government Status.

15 Feb 2010

The petitioner, UltraTech Cement Ltd., successor to M/s. Larsen & Toubro Limited, challenged an order dated 04.01.2010 of the Labour Court, Chandrapur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Dismissal of Workman Void for Non-Compliance with Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act. Employer's Failure to Seek Approval for Termination After Domestic Enquiry Renders Dismissal an Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

31 Mar 2005

The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenged the order of the Labour Court, Nashik, which held that the dismissal of the workma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint for Non-Disclosure of Offence Under MRTU & PULP Act — Transfer Order Violation Not Sufficient to Attract Section 48 Without Specific Averments of Unfair Labour Practice. The court held that a complaint under Section 48 of the MRTU & PULP Act must disclose the unfair labour practice alleged; mere violation of an order quashing transfer does not constitute an offence.

21 Mar 2005

The petitioners, Modi Xerox Limited and its officers, challenged a criminal complaint filed by the respondent, Ms. Niloo Makhija, under Section 48 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Rejection of Workman's Complaint Seeking Cancellation of Recognition of Union. Individual Employee Cannot Initiate Proceedings Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act.

3 May 2018

The dispute arose out of a complaint filed by an individual workman, Bharat Jijaba Shinde, purportedly on behalf of 309 out of 400 employees of Force ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Punishment Without Enquiry Invalid. Failure to Conduct Departmental Enquiry Before Placing Employee at End of Waiting List for Habitual Absence Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

14 Jan 2010

The case involves a writ petition filed by the employer, State Transport Co-operative Bank Limited and its Branch Manager, challenging the judgment of...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)