Search Results for "MERC Regulations 2014"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "MERC Regulations 2014"

22 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL's Petitions Challenging CGRF Orders on Recovery of Additional Charges from Consumers. MERC Orders on FAC and AEC Recovery Upheld as Binding on Distribution Licensee.

16 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a group of writ petitions filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging orders...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by DISCOMs and Generating Companies in Electricity Tariff Dispute — Change in Law Compensation for Coal Shortfall Must Be Computed Based on Actual GCV and SHR as per PPAs.

3 Mar 2023

The judgment involves two civil appeals concerning the determination of compensatory tariff for Change in Law events under long-term Power Purchase Ag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ of Quo Warranto Against Electricity Ombudsman for Lack of Standing. Petitioner failed to establish that the appointment of respondent no.2 was illegal or that he had a superior right to the post under the Electricity Act, 2003 and MERC Regulations, 2006.

15 Mar 2022

The petitioner, Amol Prabhakar Joshi, a retired Secretary to the Government of Maharashtra, filed a writ petition seeking a writ of quo warranto again...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Transmission Licence Without TBCB in HVDC Project. Section 63 of Electricity Act, 2003 is an alternative route; regulatory commission has discretion to adopt regulated tariff mechanism for transmission projects.

18 Feb 2022

The case involves a challenge by Tata Power Company Limited Transmission (TPC-T) against the grant of a transmission licence by the Maharashtra Electr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MSEDCL in Electricity Tariff Dispute Over Change in Law Due to Wildlife Notification. Held that the notification declaring buffer zone around Tadoba Tiger Reserve constituted a 'Change in Law' under PPAs, entitling APML to compensatory tariff for all four PPAs.

27 Aug 2021

The present appeals arise from a dispute between Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the appellant, and Adani Power M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MSEDCL Petition Against CGRF Interest Order in Tariff Refund Dispute. Interest on Differential Tariff Amount Not Payable Absent Specific Provision in Regulations or Agreement.

17 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged an order dated 25 January 2018 passed by the Consumer ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds MERC Tariff Regulation Fixing Stringent Station Heat Rate for Dahanu TPS — No Discrimination Found. The Court held that the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission's differentiated norms for thermal generating stations based on past performance and efficiency are valid under the Electricity Act, 2003 and National Tariff Policy, 2006.

21 Jan 2019

The appellant, Reliance Infrastructure Limited, challenged the validity of Regulation 44.2(d) of the MERC (Multi Year Tariff) Regulations 2011, which ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring distribution licensees to pay compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated period is valid and not ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003.

2 Mar 2016

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), through its Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BES&T), filed a writ petition un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Distribution Open Access Regulations. Challenge Concerns Alleged Jurisdictional Overreach Curtailing Consumers’ Right to Access Power Exchange Under the Electricity Act, 2003.

30 Oct 2015

The provided text is an incomplete extract of a judgment from the Bombay High Court in a set of writ petitions (WP Nos. 2694/2014, 2318/2014, 2294/201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Generating Company's Open Access Petition Under Electricity Act, 2003 — Distribution Licensee Cannot Deny Open Access to Captive Generating Plant. The Court held that a generating company is entitled to open access for supply of electricity to its consumers and that the distribution licensee cannot impose conditions that defeat the statutory scheme of open access under Sections 9, 10, and 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

18 Jan 2011

The case involves a writ petition filed by The Tata Power Company Limited and others against the Government of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner,...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)