Search Results for "Kotak Mahindra Bank"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Kotak Mahindra Bank"

138 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 138 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI's Order Against Kotak Mutual Fund for Violating SEBI Circular on Side Pocketing of Debt Securities. The Court held that the creation of segregated portfolios without complying with the mandatory conditions of the SEBI circular dated 28th December 2018 was impermissible, and the fund managers and trustees were liable for the resulting losses.

13 Jul 2026

The case involves appeals by Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited (Kotak AMC), Kotak Mahindra Trustee Company Limited, and several senior e...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

6 Mar 2025

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Provisional Attachment Orders Under Section 110 of Customs Act, 1962 — Lack of Reasonable Belief and Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. Attachment orders set aside as customs authorities failed to demonstrate reasonable belief that goods were liable to confiscation and did not follow mandatory procedure under Section 110(3) requiring notice within six months.

13 Mar 2024

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by Chokshi Arvind Jewellers and Pallav Gold, challenging provisional attachment orders passed by t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case Over Bank Guarantee Validity - High Court's Direction to Substitute Bank Guarantee Set Aside as Appellant Complied with Original Order for Scheduled Bank Located in India Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

24 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from special leave petitions filed by SEPCO Electric Power Construction Corporation against Pow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd v. Williamson Magor & Co Ltd & Anr — Put Option Agreement Dispute. The court found that a valid arbitration agreement existed based on correspondence and conduct, and appointed a former judge as arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Administrator’s Report for Recovery of Diverted Estate Assets in Testamentary Suit. Court Appointed Administrator Seeks Directions Against Defendant for Unauthorized Diversion of Deceased’s Funds to Various Entities.

21 Dec 2018

The matter concerned the administration of the estate of Purvez Burjor Dalal, who died in Mumbai on 7 December 2011. A testamentary suit was institute...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeals by Bank in Securitisation Act Case Regarding Maintainability of Civil Suits — The Court Examines Whether Plaints Against Bank Are Barred Under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

26 Oct 2018

The litigation arose from a batch of five civil suits filed by several plaintiffs against M/s. Orbit Corporation Ltd. and Axis Bank Limited, concernin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining BCCI from Terminating IPL Franchise Agreement with Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited. Court Holds Termination Notice Invalid for Not Providing 30-Day Cure Period Under Clause 11.1 of Franchise Agreement.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited (DCHL), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in Iron Ore Sale Dispute. The court held that the Section 9 application was within limitation and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Aug 2012

The appellant, M/s Shree Mallikarjun Shipping Pvt. Ltd., entered into a contract dated 25.2.2008 with the respondent, M/s Balaji Logistics Carriers, f...

Tribunals

NCLAT Upholds Admission of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Under Section 7 of IBC, 2016 — Asset Reconstruction Company Held to be Financial Creditor and Application Not Barred by Limitation.

30 Nov -0001

The appeal was filed by the suspended director of M/s. Sri Pavana Keerthi Hotels India Private Limited (Corporate Debtor) against the order of the Nat...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)