NCLAT Upholds Admission of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Under Section 7 of IBC, 2016 — Asset Reconstruction Company Held to be Financial Creditor and Application Not Barred by Limitation.

Tribunals: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Bench: CHENNAI In Favour of Prosecution
  • 48
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the suspended director of M/s. Sri Pavana Keerthi Hotels India Private Limited (Corporate Debtor) against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad, which admitted the Corporate Debtor into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) on an application by Pridhvi Asset Reconstruction and Securitization Company Ltd. (Financial Creditor). The Financial Creditor had acquired the debt from the original lender, and the Corporate Debtor defaulted on repayment. The Adjudicating Authority held that the Financial Creditor is a 'Financial Creditor' under the IBC and that the application was not barred by limitation under Section 238A of IBC read with Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The appellant challenged the order on the grounds that the Financial Creditor is not a financial creditor and that the application was time-barred. The NCLAT, after hearing arguments, upheld the order of the Adjudicating Authority, holding that an Asset Reconstruction Company is a financial creditor and that the application was within limitation. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Insolvency Law - Financial Creditor - Definition - Asset Reconstruction Company - The issue was whether an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC) qualifies as a Financial Creditor under Section 5(7) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court held that an ARC, having acquired a financial debt, steps into the shoes of the original financial creditor and is entitled to file an application under Section 7 of the Code. (Paras 1-19)

B) Limitation Act - Limitation for Section 7 Application - Article 137 - The court considered whether the application under Section 7 of IBC, 2016 was barred by limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963. It held that the limitation period of three years starts from the date of default, and acknowledgment of debt by the corporate debtor extends the limitation period. The application was found to be within limitation. (Paras 20-30)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Asset Reconstruction Company is a Financial Creditor under IBC, 2016 and whether the application under Section 7 is barred by limitation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The order of the Adjudicating Authority admitting the Corporate Debtor into CIRP is upheld.

Law Points

  • Definition of Financial Creditor under IBC
  • 2016 includes Asset Reconstruction Companies
  • Limitation for Section 7 application is governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act
  • 1963
  • period of limitation starts from date of default
  • acknowledgment of debt extends limitation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (NCLAT) (01) 75

Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No.224/2022

0000-00-00

Jatindranath Swain

Mr. E. Om Prakash, Senior Advocate for Mr. K. Ravindranath, Advocate (Appellant); Mr. Srinath Sridevan, Senior Advocate for Mr. Surya Teja Nalla, Advocate (Respondent No.1)

Virigineni Anjaiah

Pridhvi Asset Reconstruction and Securitization Company Ltd. & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against order admitting Corporate Debtor into CIRP under Section 7 of IBC, 2016

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of the impugned order of the Adjudicating Authority

Filing Reason

The appellant challenged the admission of CIRP on grounds that the Financial Creditor is not a financial creditor and the application is barred by limitation

Previous Decisions

The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, Hyderabad) admitted the Corporate Debtor into CIRP under Section 7 of IBC, 2016

Issues

Whether the Asset Reconstruction Company is a Financial Creditor under IBC, 2016? Whether the application under Section 7 of IBC, 2016 is barred by limitation?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the Financial Creditor is not a financial creditor and the application is time-barred. Respondent argued that the Asset Reconstruction Company is a financial creditor and the application is within limitation.

Ratio Decidendi

An Asset Reconstruction Company, having acquired a financial debt, is a Financial Creditor under Section 5(7) of IBC, 2016 and is entitled to file an application under Section 7. The limitation period for such application is three years under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, starting from the date of default, and acknowledgment of debt extends the limitation.

Judgment Excerpts

The present Appeal has been filed under section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the Order passed by the Adjudicating Authority... In its order the Adjudicating Authority held that the Financial Creditor... comes within the definition of ‘Financial Creditor’... and that the application... is not barred by limitation...

Procedural History

The Financial Creditor filed an application under Section 7 of IBC, 2016 before the NCLT, Hyderabad, which was admitted on 11.04.2022. The appellant filed this appeal before NCLAT against that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016: Section 7, Section 14, Section 61, Section 238A
  • Limitation Act, 1963: Article 137
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Tribunals NCLAT Upholds Admission of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Under Section 7 of IBC, 2016 — Asset Reconstruction Company Held to be Financial Creditor and Application Not Barred by Limitation.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Sets Aside Tribunal's Reinstatement Order - Upholds University's Compulsory Retirement of Junior Engineer for Serious Misconduct Under Maharashtra Universities Standard Code Rules