Search Results for "Karnataka Court Fees Act"

435 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 435 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Excise License Renewal Case — State Cannot Deny Renewal Without Proper Notice and Hearing. Renewal of FL-3 license under Maharashtra Foreign Liquor Rules cannot be refused on grounds of pending criminal proceedings without affording opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, John Distilleries Private Limited (formerly John Distilleries Ltd.), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, with its ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Demand Against University for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Grant Personal Hearing Renders Order Illegal Under Section 74(1) of CGST Act, 2017. Circulars Mandating Personal Hearing Before Adverse Order Are Binding on Adjudicating Authority.

The University of Mumbai, established under the Bombay University Act, 1953 and later governed by the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016, filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Copra as Not Notified Agricultural Produce Under APMC Act. Explanation to Rule 32(1) of Goa APMC Rules Held Ultra Vires as Copra Not in Schedule to Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioners, Marico Industries Ltd. and Jude Linhares, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the demand for market...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Refund of Court Fees in Suit Settled Through Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Court Holds That Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 Does Not Mandate Refund Upon Settlement Through Alternative Dispute Resolution.

The petitioner, Sanjeevkumar Harakchand Kankariya, entered into an agreement to sell immovable property with respondents No.3 and 4. When the agreemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State to Reimburse Fees for Backward Class Students in Private Unaided Schools - State's Obligation Under Article 21-A and RTE Act

The petitions raised questions about the liability of the State to reimburse fees for elementary and secondary education to children belonging to back...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Unaided Private School to Fix Fees Subject to Reasonable Regulation. Fee Fixation Must Be Transparent and Not Excessive Under Grant in Aid Code and Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1987.

The petitioners, Hindi Vidya Bhavan Society and another, are a society registered under the Societies' Registration Act, 1860 and a public trust under...