Search Results for "KGST Act"

9 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show Cause Notice in GST Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice Issued by Additional Commissioner Without Proper Authorization and Without Providing Relevant Documents Set Aside.

The petitioner, M/s. Vigneshwara Transport Company, a proprietor engaged in transportation of goods and registered under the Central Goods and Service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Appellate Order and Remands GST Refund Case for Fresh Consideration Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Appellate Authority Dismissed Appeal Without Considering Merits or Granting Hearing, Mandating Remand Under Section 107(11) of KGST/CGST Act.

The petitioner, M/S ITD CEMINDIA JV, an association of persons, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Stay Order in GST Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction — Mandamus Issued to Admit Appeal. Pre-deposit condition under Section 107(6) of CGST/SGST Acts 2017 cannot be imposed by appellate authority without first admitting the appeal.

The petitioner, M/S Tejas Arecanut Traders, a proprietary concern engaged in the business of arecanut trading, filed a writ petition under Articles 22...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in GST Vehicle Seizure Case — Upholds Requirement of Advance Intimation Under Section 129(6) of KGST Act. Failure to Furnish E-Way Bill Details Before Movement Attracts Penalty Despite Subsequent Production.

The case involves an intra-court appeal filed by the Revenue (Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Commercial Taxes Officer) against an order of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to GST Notification Extending Time Limit for Show Cause Notice. Notification No. 09/2023 held valid under Section 168A of CGST Act, 2017 as a legislative act not amenable to certiorari.

The petitioner, M/s Sahaj Construction, a registered dealer under the GST laws, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...