Search Results for "Judicial Removal"

1837 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1837 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Junior Clerk for Misconduct and Habitual Absence from Duty. Disciplinary Authority's Order of Dismissal Confirmed as Charges of Negligence and Insubordination Were Proved in Departmental Enquiry.

The petitioner, Shivdas Dodku Borkar, was a Junior Clerk in the District Court, Nagpur, and was posted at Narkhed. He was subjected to disciplinary pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Gramin Dak Sevak for Misappropriation of Public Funds. High Court Exceeded Judicial Review by Reappreciating Evidence in Disciplinary Proceedings Under Gramin Dak Sevak (Conduct and Engagement) Rules, 2011.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur dated 02.09.2024, which set aside the penalty of re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Judicial Officer Discharged During Probation and Quashes Discharge Order. Discharge Based on Bail Order and Pending Inquiry Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice and Is Arbitrary Under Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010 and Article 233 of Constitution of India.

The dispute involved a judicial officer appointed as an Additional District Judge in 2013 under the Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010, who was d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of District Judge Due to Non-Communication of Adverse Remarks. Adverse CR Entries Without Communication Violate Principles of Natural Justice Under Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008.

The petitioner, a judicial officer, challenged an order dated 26 February 2010 passed by the Principal Secretary and Legal Advisor, Law and Justice De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Vires of Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 Amidst Concerns Over Judicial Independence. Petitioners Argue That Provisions on Appointment, Tenure, and Removal of Tribunal Members Undermine the Constitutional Balance of Power.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions challenging the vires of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021. The petitioners, led by the Madras Bar Assoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Judicial Officer in POCSO Bribery Case — Rule 5(1)(viii) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1979. Petitioner found guilty of accepting bribe through peon for acquittal in POCSO case; disciplinary proceedings and removal upheld.

The Petitioner, a Judicial Officer appointed in 2009, was removed from service by the State of Maharashtra under Rule 5(1)(viii) of the Maharashtra Ci...