Search Results for "Inventive Step"

8 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Refusal of Patent for Free-Flowing Food Grade Sodium Nitrite. Impugned Order Set Aside for Lack of Reasoning and Failure to Assess Invention as a Whole.

The Petitioner, Deepak Nitrite Limited, filed a petition under Section 117A of the Patents Act, 1970, challenging an order dated 2nd March 2023 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Patent Infringement Suits as Patents Were Revoked Prior to Filing. Summary Judgment Granted Under Order XIII-A CPC as Plaintiff Had No Locus Standi to Sue for Infringement of Revoked Patents.

The plaintiff, Bharat Bhogilal Patel, filed two suits for infringement of two patents granted in 2003. The defendants, TVS Electronics Ltd. and Kalelk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Controller's Refusal of Patent Registration Due to Non-Consideration of Arbitral Award and Deed of Assignment. Failure to Appreciate Evidence and Raise Objections in Examination Report Renders Order Unsustainable Under Section 15 of Patents Act, 1970.

The petitioner, Euro-apex B.V., entered into a licence agreement with Shinhan Apex Corporation in 1993, authorizing the latter to manufacture and sell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Patent Refusal for Lack of Inventive Step and Enablement. Controller's order upheld as amended claims were not enabled and lacked inventive step under Patents Act, 1970.

The appellant, Caleb Suresh Motupalli, filed a patent application for an invention titled 'Necktie Persona-Extender/Environment-integrator and method ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Revocation of Patent for Bt Cotton Technology, Remands for Trial on Patent Validity and Infringement Issues. The Court held that patent validity under Section 3(j) of the Patents Act, 1970 cannot be summarily decided without trial and requires expert evidence.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals arising from a suit for permanent injunction filed by Monsanto Technology LLC and others (plaintiffs) again...