Search Results for "Interest under Section 220(2)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Interest under Section 220(2)"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Cognizance in Cheque Bounce Case — No Ground to Interfere with Concurrent Findings. Petitioners/accused failed to show any illegality in the order of taking cognizance under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the revisional order rejecting their challenge.

22 Jan 2026

The petitioners, who are the accused in a cheque dishonour case, filed a criminal petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Press Release on GST Classification of Hand Sanitisers as Disinfectants — Executive Cannot Pre-empt Quasi-Judicial Adjudication. Press Release dated 15.07.2020 directing classification of alcohol-based hand sanitisers as 'disinfectants' under GST held ultra vires and manifestly arbitrary for encroaching upon quasi-judicial functions.

11 Nov 2024

The petitioner, M/s Schulke India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in trading of hand rubs/sanitisers and antiseptics, which it claims are used as pharmaceutical...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Application for Construction in Pachmarhi Wildlife Sanctuary Due to Pending Stay on Exclusion. Applicant's land not finally excluded from sanctuary; High Court's interim stay on Collector's order prevents any commercial activity without Court permission.

16 May 2024

The applicant, M/s Shewalkar Developers Limited, filed interlocutory applications seeking permission to construct a health/eco-resort on two plots (Pl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — Appellant's Prior User and Registration of Mark 'Shriphal' Establishes Prima Facie Case for Injunction.

6 May 2022

The appellant, M/s. Mysore Deep Perfumery Household, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting agarbatti, scent, perfume, camphor, dho...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assignee of Debt to Proceed Under SARFAESI Act Despite Company Being Under Liquidation. Assignee Steps into Shoes of Original Lender and Can Enforce Security Interest Under Section 13 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

13 Dec 2019

The petitioner, ASREC (India) Limited, is a company registered as a Reconstruction Company and Securitisation Company with the Reserve Bank of India u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.

17 Sep 2018

The judgment concerns two admiralty suits filed in the Bombay High Court. Admiralty Suit No.3 of 2011 was filed by the time charterer of the vessel 'N...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Multiple FIRs Against Same Petitioner in Cheating Cases — Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction and Abuse of Process. Petitioner Smt. Vishalakshi Bhat successfully challenged FIRs filed in different police stations for similar allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust, as the court found the complaints lacked territorial jurisdiction and were an abuse of the process of law under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

11 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Smt. Vishalakshi Bhat, filed multiple criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking q...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Dispute — Landlord Estopped from Denying Tenancy After Accepting Status and Giving Undertaking for Alternate Accommodation. Principle of Estoppel Under Section 116 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Applied to Prevent Landlord from Resiling from Earlier Admissions.

10 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Pius Bonaventure Fernandes, was a tenant of residential premises in 'Gorden House', Mumbai, owned by Manu Narang (predecessor of respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Denying Locus Standi to Employees in Reference Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Individual Workmen Have No Independent Right to Prosecute Reference but Industrial Court Must Exercise Discretion to Hear Them if Interests Affected.

6 Nov 2006

The petitioners, employees of Empress Mills Retail Sales Division, challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 16th October 1995 which held that...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)