Search Results for "Industrial All Risks Policy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Industrial All Risks Policy"

89 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Wear and Tear Exclusion Not Applicable to Sudden Breakdown. The court held that the insurer failed to prove that the bearing failure was due to wear and tear, and the breakdown was a fortuitous event covered under the Industrial All Risk Policy.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, United Phosphorous Limited, was in the business of pesticides and chemicals. It purchased a Gas Turbine Engine from GE Packaged Power ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Policy Exclusion for Wear and Tear Does Not Apply to Sudden Breakdown. The court held that the majority arbitrators' interpretation of the exclusion clause was plausible and not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Feb 2019

The petitioner, United Phosphorous Limited, purchased a Gas Turbine Engine from GE and obtained an Industrial All Risk Policy from the respondent, Uni...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Holds that Taking Insurance Policy for Commercial Premises is for Commercial Purpose, Excluding Complainant from Definition of 'Consumer' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The Court ruled that a commercial entity taking fire insurance policy for its business premises is not a 'consumer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Act, as the policy is taken for commercial purpose.

13 Apr 2023

The present appeals by special leave assail the judgment and order dated 3rd December, 2004 of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (Na...

High Court

Bombay High Court considers interim injunction in passing-off suit over 'iTerm' mark for online insurance policies. Court examines whether 'iTerm' is inherently distinctive or has acquired secondary meaning under common law of passing off, and plaintiff's challenge to defendant's use of 'Aviva i-Term Smart'.

19 Aug 2019

The plaintiff, Aegon Life Insurance Company Limited, instituted a suit for passing off against Aviva Life Insurance Company India Limited, seeking an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suit for Pure Economic Loss Without Physical Damage — Claim for Production Loss Due to Vessel Grounding Held Not Maintainable in Tort of Negligence. Defendant Vessel Owner Not Liable as No Duty of Care Owed to Jetty Owner for Purely Economic Loss.

9 Jun 2014

The plaintiff, owner of a captive jetty and PVC resin plant, filed an admiralty suit against the defendant vessel, claiming production loss of Rs. 12,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses HPCL's Challenge to Residential Complex Near Refinery; Upholds Permissions and Finds No Merit in Challenge to D.C. Regulations

12 Apr 2012

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a Government of India enterprise operating...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mediclaim Policy Renewal Dispute — Insurer Must Disclose Material Changes in Coverage at Renewal. Renewal of Insurance Policy is Not a Fresh Contract; Insurer Owed Duty to Inform Insured of Restrictive Terms Under Principle of Utmost Good Faith.

9 Dec 2021

The appellants, Jacob Punnen and his wife, held a Mediclaim policy with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. since 1982, renewed annually. In March 2008, t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Territorial Jurisdiction in Section 11 Arbitration Application Over Insurance Claim Dispute. Court Finds Entire Cause of Action Arose in Telangana and Head Office Presence in Mumbai Alone Did Not Confer Jurisdiction Under Clause XII of Letters Patent.

16 Sep 2025

Two applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were filed before the Bombay High Court seeking appointment of a sole ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Arbitral Award in Hire Purchase Dispute — Reduces Interest Rate from 36% to 24% per annum. Court holds that 36% per annum interest on delayed payments is penal and excessive, and reduces it to 24% per annum under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Jan 2015

The petitioners, Ashwin Crane & Construction and Ashwin Virji Dhame, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal in ESI Coverage Dispute - Section 2A and Regulation 10B Held Mandatory. Employer's Failure to Obtain Code Number Does Not Excuse Contribution Liability Under Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

31 Jul 2017

The appeal was filed by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) under Section 82 of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 against the order...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)