Search Results for "IPL franchise"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "IPL franchise"

9 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal from Injunction Order Granting Interim Relief in IPL Franchise Termination Dispute. Division Bench Considers Whether Change in Shareholding Pattern Constituted Irremediable Breach Warranting Termination of Franchise Agreement Under Clauses 10 and 11, and Whether Conditions Imposed by Single Judge Were Sufficient Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Dec 2010

Background: The dispute pertained to the termination of a franchise agreement between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and KPH Dream C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Interim Order in IPL Franchise Dispute. Court finds no misrepresentation in bid process and upholds arbitrator's order granting interim measures while imposing conditions on franchisee to protect BCCI's interests.

14 Dec 2010

Background: The dispute arose from the Indian Premier League (IPL) franchise agreement between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Ja...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Franchisee in IPL Termination Dispute. Court restrains BCCI from terminating franchise agreement and issuing fresh tender pending arbitration, holding that prima facie case and balance of convenience favor the franchisee.

18 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. (DCHL), was the successful bidder for the Hyderabad franchise of the Indian Premier League (IPL) and en...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging BCCI's Amendment Excluding IPL and CLT20 from Conflict of Interest Regulations. The court held that the amendment was a valid policy decision by a private body and not subject to judicial review unless it violates statutory provisions or fundamental rights.

11 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the amendment to Regulation 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining BCCI from Terminating IPL Franchise Agreement with Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited. Court Holds Termination Notice Invalid for Not Providing 30-Day Cure Period Under Clause 11.1 of Franchise Agreement.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited (DCHL), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses BCCI's Section 9 Petition for Enhanced Bank Guarantee in IPL Franchise Dispute. Court holds that interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be used to modify or enhance security already ordered by consent, and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any new circumstances warranting additional protection.

24 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging BCCI Disciplinary Committee's Refusal to Recuse Members. Natural Justice Requires Impartial Adjudication; Bias Allegations Against Committee Members Must Be Examined.

15 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Lalit Kumar Modi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 11th August 2010 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds ESI Coverage for BCCI as 'Shop' Under ESI Act — Sports Body Engages in Systematic Commercial Activity. BCCI held to be a 'shop' under notification dated 18th September 1978 issued under Section 1(5) of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, as it carries out systematic commercial activities including sale of tickets, broadcasting rights, and merchandise.

24 Jun 2022

The present appeal was filed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) against the judgment and order dated 9th September 2021 passed by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Opinion of Adjudicating Authority Under FEMA for Failure to Supply Documents and Provide Reasons. The Court Directs That All Documents Referred to in the Complaint Must Be Furnished and That the Opinion Under Rule 4 of the Adjudication Rules Must Be a Reasoned Order.

6 Feb 2014

The writ petition was filed by Lalit Kumar Modi, a former Vice President of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Chairman of the India...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)