Search Results for "ICADR"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "ICADR"

8 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of ICADR Arbitral Orders in Private Road Concession Dispute. Core issue involves whether arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and ICADR Rules can be overridden by the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983.

26 Jul 2026

The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal arising out of Special Leave Petition No. 13415 of 2025, challenging the High Court of Madhya Pradesh's judgmen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Appoints Independent Arbitrator in Perkins Eastman v. HSCC Dispute — Clause 24 Arbitration Mechanism Invalid Due to Lack of Impartiality. The Court held that a person ineligible to act as arbitrator cannot appoint an arbitrator, relying on TRF Limited v. Energo Engineering Projects Limited.

29 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court considered an application under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the App...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Appoints Arbitrator in Section 11 Petition After Nine-Year Delay. Petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed in 2008, finally disposed with appointment of sole arbitrator.

26 Oct 2017

The petitioner, N.K. Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, on 12.08.2008, seeking ...

High Court

High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Disputes Arising from Contract Dated 27.09.2013.

8 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Sobha Projects and Trade Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Despite Non-Compliance with Pre-Arbitration Notice Period. The court held that the respondent's failure to respond to the notice and its conduct constituted waiver of the 30-day notice requirement under Clause 64(3)(b)(ii) of the Indian Railways Standard General Conditions of Contract.

3 Apr 2024

The applicant, S. N. Naik & Brothers, a proprietary concern, entered into a contract with the Union of India (respondent) on 23.09.2019 for constructi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Independent Arbitrator in Railway Contract Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator by Respondent Held Invalid; Former High Court Judge Appointed as Sole Arbitrator.

8 Dec 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Eagle – MPCC (J.V.), a joint venture company, entered into a contract with the respondent, South Western Railway, on 08/03/2011...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge to Arbitrator's Interlocutory Order on Summoning of Documents. Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Interlocutory Orders Under Articles 226 and 227 in Light of SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering.

16 Mar 2023

The dispute arose between Dodballapur Integrated Textile Park Limited and the claimants, Vinod G. Jain and Premalatha G. Jain, under a sub-lease agree...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes 75% Deposit Condition in Arbitration Award Stay — Section 36(2) of Arbitration Act Does Not Mandate Pre-Deposit. Court holds that Section 36(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not impose a mandatory pre-deposit condition for stay of an arbitral award, and the trial court erred in imposing 75% deposit without considering the petitioner's financial hardship.

7 Aug 2025

The petitioner, ITI Limited, challenged an order dated 19.04.2025 passed by the LXXXIII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge (Commercial Court), Bengal...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)