Search Results for "Group Secretaries"

106 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 106 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order in Service Transfer Dispute — Transfer on Request Cannot Be Challenged; Tribunal's Direction for Reconsideration Set Aside.

The petitioner, Ganesh Jairam Jagdale, a Tahsildar, challenged a common judgment dated 22/10/2020 of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, Nagpur B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Equal Pay for University Personal Assistant with High Court Secretaries. Principle of 'Equal Pay for Equal Work' Not Applicable Where Work and Responsibilities Are Not Identical.

The petitioner, Vitthal Marutirao Ekbote, was appointed as a Stenographer (English) with the University of Pune on 11 June 1979 and served in the offi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Mandamus Directing Finalization of RPF as Organized Service. In-Principle Approval by DoPT Was Conditional and Subject to Cadre Review Committee Approval, Which Was Not Granted.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Delhi High Court that had directed the governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Use of Section 69B of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 After Deletion of Section 69A. Court holds that Section 69B is an independent provision and its survival does not depend on Section 69A.

The petitioner, The Akola District Central Cooperative Bank Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointment of Special Counsel in Customs and Excise Matters. Rule 9 of Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982 and Rule 12 of Central Excise (Appeals) Rules, 2001 held not ultra vires.

The petitioner, an advocate enrolled in the Karnataka State Bar Council, filed a Public Interest Litigation in 2014 challenging an endorsement dated 2...