Search Results for "Gangakhed"

86 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 86 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Amendment and Adjournment in Civil Suit — No Interference with Discretionary Orders Under Order VI Rule 17 and Order XVII Rule 1 CPC.

The appellants, original defendants in a civil suit, filed an appeal challenging two orders passed by the Civil Judge Senior Division, Gangakhed: (1) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case Due to Failure to Consider Evidence. Tribunal's Rejection of Compensation Claim Set Aside as Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Death Occurred Due to Accidental Fall from Train.

The appellants, sons of the deceased Dhondabai, filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for the death ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Husband and In-Laws in Domestic Violence Case — No Prima Facie Case of Cruelty or Dowry Demand Established. Allegations of Demand for Car and Cash Found Vague and Unsupported by Evidence Under Sections 498-A IPC and 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

The petitioners, Dr. Saurabh Velukar (husband), his mother Adv. Surekha Yelurkar, and father Dr. Shivhar Yelurkar, filed a writ petition under Article...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 read with 34 IPC set aside as circumstantial evidence was insufficient and dying declaration unreliable.

The case involves appeals against conviction for murder of Babarao Dhanewad. The deceased was living with his wife (accused No.3) and children in a fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Vague Allegations. FIR under Sections 498A, 323 read with 34 IPC quashed as allegations lacked specific dates and incidents, constituting abuse of process of law.

The applicants, including the mother-in-law, brother-in-law, and other relatives of the informant's husband, filed an application under Section 482 of...