Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 read with 34 IPC set aside as circumstantial evidence was insufficient and dying declaration unreliable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 14
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves appeals against conviction for murder of Babarao Dhanewad. The deceased was living with his wife (accused No.3) and children in a farmhouse. The prosecution alleged that the appellants, including the wife and her relatives, killed Babarao due to suspicion of illicit relations. The body was found in a well. The trial court convicted all appellants under Sections 302 and 201 IPC. On appeal, the High Court scrutinized the circumstantial evidence. The court found that the motive was weak and not proved. The last seen evidence was contradictory and from interested witnesses. The recovery of a weapon was not credible. The dying declaration was recorded by a police officer without medical certification and was not voluntary. The court held that the chain of circumstances was incomplete and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The appeals were allowed, convictions set aside, and appellants acquitted.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Circumstantial Evidence - Sections 302, 201, 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - The court examined whether the chain of circumstances was complete and consistent with the guilt of the appellants. Held that the prosecution failed to establish motive, last seen evidence was unreliable, recovery of weapon was doubtful, and dying declaration was not voluntary. Conviction set aside (Paras 1-30).

B) Evidence Law - Dying Declaration - Section 32 Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - The dying declaration was recorded by a police officer without certification of fitness by a doctor. Held that such declaration cannot be relied upon without corroboration (Paras 15-20).

C) Criminal Law - Last Seen Theory - The evidence of last seen was inconsistent and not corroborated by independent witnesses. Held that last seen alone is insufficient to sustain conviction (Paras 10-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellants under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 IPC based on circumstantial evidence is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeals allowed. Conviction set aside. Appellants acquitted of all charges.

Law Points

  • Circumstantial evidence must be complete and consistent with guilt
  • motive must be proved
  • last seen theory requires corroboration
  • recovery of weapon must be credible
  • dying declaration must be voluntary and reliable
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (12) 28

Criminal Appeal No. 486 of 2002 with Criminal Appeal No. 487 of 2002 and Criminal Appeal No. 508 of 2002

2017-12-20

T.V. Nalawade, Arun M. Dhavale

Mr. R.N. Chavhan h/f Mr. Vijay Sharam, Mr. S.S. Rathi, Mr. R.V. Dasalkar

Nivrutti s/o Kondiba Ghalewad, Dhondiba s/o Sonba Ghalewad, Haribhau s/o Dadarao Dhobale, Radhabai w/o Babarao Dhanewad

State of Maharashtra, Dhondabai w/o Shankarrao Dhanewad

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeals against conviction for murder and destruction of evidence.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought acquittal from conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 IPC.

Filing Reason

Appellants were convicted by the trial court for murder of Babarao Dhanewad.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted all appellants under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC.

Issues

Whether the circumstantial evidence is sufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Whether the dying declaration is reliable and voluntary. Whether the last seen theory is credible.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the evidence is weak, motive not proved, last seen evidence unreliable, recovery doubtful, and dying declaration not voluntary. State argued that the chain of circumstances is complete and conviction is justified.

Ratio Decidendi

In a case based on circumstantial evidence, the chain of circumstances must be complete and consistent only with the guilt of the accused. The prosecution failed to prove motive, last seen, recovery, and dying declaration beyond reasonable doubt. Hence, the appellants are entitled to acquittal.

Judgment Excerpts

The dying declaration was recorded by a police officer without certification of fitness by a doctor. The last seen evidence is inconsistent and not corroborated by independent witnesses. The prosecution failed to establish the motive for the murder.

Procedural History

The trial court convicted the appellants. They appealed to the High Court. The High Court heard the appeals and acquitted them.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 201, 34
  • Indian Evidence Act, 1872: 32
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Sets Aside Bail Granted to Husband in Dowry Death Case — Prima Facie Case of Cruelty and Abetment of Suicide Established Under Sections 498-A, 306 IPC. The court found that the Sessions Judge's order was perverse and failed to con...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Gang Rape and Abduction of Minor — Evidence of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical and Circumstantial Evidence. The court held that the testimony of the prosecutrix, an 11-ye...