Search Results for "GST arrest"

14 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Compensation Claim in GST Arrest Case -- Petitioner's Allegations of Illegal Detention Rejected -- Proper Procedure Followed Under CGST Act

The petitioner, filed a criminal writ petition seeking compensation of Rs. 10,00,000/- for alleged illegal arrest and detention by GST authorities -- ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Arrest Powers Under Customs Act and GST Acts: Safeguards and Judicial Review. Balancing Individual Liberty and State Authority in Tax Evasion Cases

Arrest Powers Under Customs Act and GST Acts:-- The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of arrest provisions under the Customs Act, 1962...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State of Gujarat's Appeal in Service Tax Summons Case — Respondents Directed to Cooperate with Investigation Under Section 145 of Central Excise Act, 1944. Summons for Interrogation in Service Tax Inquiry Held Valid and Enforceable.

The State of Gujarat appealed against an order of the High Court that had quashed a summons issued to the respondents under Section 145 of the Central...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show Cause Notice in GST Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice Issued by Additional Commissioner Without Proper Authorization and Without Providing Relevant Documents Set Aside.

The petitioner, M/s. Vigneshwara Transport Company, a proprietor engaged in transportation of goods and registered under the Central Goods and Service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Application for Pre-Arrest Bail Dismissed in Serious Impersonation and Fraud Case Involving GST Officers. Court rejects anticipatory bail considering the gravity of the offense, involvement of police personnel, and the necessity of custodial interrogation.

1. Introduction of Case (Paras 1-3): The applicant sought pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No. 02 of 2024 registered at Azadnagar Police Stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Listed Company Seeking Copies of Seized Documents from GST Intelligence. Right to Copies Implicit Under CGST Act to Enable Compliance with SEBI Regulations and Audit Requirements.

The Petitioner, High Ground Enterprises Ltd., a company listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange with over 10,000 shareholders,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Editor-in-Chief in Abetment to Suicide Case — High Court Erred in Declining Bail Without Prima Facie Evaluation of FIR. Non-Payment of Dues Alone Does Not Constitute Abetment to Suicide Under Section 306 IPC.

The appellant, Arnab Manoranjan Goswami, Editor-in-Chief of Republic TV, was arrested on 4 November 2020 in connection with FIR No. 59 of 2018 registe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in Unlawful Activities Case — Appellant Convicted for Criminal Conspiracy and Unlawful Activities. The Court upheld the conviction under Section 120B IPC and Sections 10(a)(i), 10(a)(iv), 38(1) of UAP Act, finding no perversity in concurrent findings.

The appellant was arraigned as an accused in FIR Crime No. 1 of 2015 registered at Q Branch Police Station, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, for offences p...