Search Results for "Fragmentation Act"

108 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 108 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Possession Suit Based on Registered Sale Deed — Title Not Extinguished by Subsequent Mutation or Revenue Entries. Registered sale deed confers absolute title and possession; subsequent revenue entries or mutation do not affect title unless set aside by competent court.

The appeal arises from a suit for possession filed by the plaintiff-appellant (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Challenges Jurisdictional Authority Over Land Ownership Dispute. Supreme Court to Decide Whether Civil Court or Consolidation Officer Holds Jurisdiction Under the Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation Holdings Act, 1947

The writ petition challenges two court orders that determined the Civil Court lacks jurisdiction over a land ownership and possession suit, arguing th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Fragmentation Act Case — Preferential Right of Contiguous Land Owner Upheld. Sale of Fragmented Land to Non-Contiguous Purchaser Violates Section 7 of Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947.

The appellant, Vilas Shivmurti Munde, filed a second appeal against the dismissal of his suit for declaration and injunction. The suit sought to decla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...