Search Results for "Footpath obstruction"

13 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes PIL on Footpath Encroachments with Directions for Removal and Monitoring. Court holds that encroachments on public footpaths violate pedestrian rights and must be cleared by municipal authorities, with compliance monitored by District Legal Services Authority.

The petitioner, D.S. Ramachandra Reddy, an advocate, filed a public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Revision Petition in Section 133 CrPC Right of Way Dispute. Dispute over easementary rights between Mundkars held to be of civil nature, not amenable to summary proceedings under Section 133 CrPC.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by Shri Laxman alias Bala Govekar (petitioner) against an order of the learned Sessions Judge, Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Criminal Intimidation Case Due to Settlement Between Parties. Settlement Reached Between Applicant and Informant Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Sections 126(2), 351(1), 351(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

The applicant filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR No. 51 of 2025 registered...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Taluk Panchayat Order Directing APMC to Pay Property Tax on Market Yard Land. Land Owned by APMC and Used for Market Purposes is Exempt from Property Tax Under Section 199 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

The petitioner, the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) of Gubbi Taluk, established under the Karnataka Agricultural Marketing (R & D) Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal and Contempt Petition in Demolition Dispute -- Petitioner Challenge to BMC's Demolition Order Under BMC Act Fails, Contempt Allegations Rejected

The Appellant, filed an Appeal against the dismissal of a Notice of Motion seeking an interim injunction to restrain the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Against Nashik Municipal Corporation for Non-Compliance with Government Resolution on Religious Structures. Court Directs Publication of List of Religious Shrines Before Demolition to Ensure Natural Justice Under Government Resolution dated 5/5/2011.

The petitioners, public-spirited residents of Nashik, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to the Nashik Municipal Corporation (respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Title Suit. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Suit Where No Land Grabbing Allegation is Made by Government.

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by the 1st Additional Civil Judge, Mangaluru, in ...