High Court of Karnataka Quashes Taluk Panchayat Order Directing APMC to Pay Property Tax on Market Yard Land. Land Owned by APMC and Used for Market Purposes is Exempt from Property Tax Under Section 199 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 70
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) of Gubbi Taluk, established under the Karnataka Agricultural Marketing (R & D) Act, 1966, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 22.06.2022 issued by the 1st respondent, the Executive Officer of the Taluk Panchayat, Gubbi. The order demanded payment of property tax on land owned by the APMC and used for market purposes. The APMC contended that the land is exempt from property tax under Section 199 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, as it is used for a public purpose and the APMC is a local authority. The respondents argued that the exemption under Section 199 was impliedly repealed by the Karnataka Agricultural Marketing (R & D) Act, 1966, which does not provide for such exemption. The court analyzed the provisions of both Acts and found no inconsistency. It held that Section 199 of the Panchayat Raj Act exempts properties used for public purposes, including those of local authorities like the APMC. The Marketing Act does not impose property tax, and therefore, there is no implied repeal. The court quashed the impugned order and directed the respondents not to demand property tax from the petitioner for the land used for market purposes. The writ petition was allowed.

Headnote

A) Local Government - Property Tax Exemption - Agricultural Produce Market Committee - Section 199 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 - The petitioner, an APMC established under the Karnataka Agricultural Marketing (R &

D) Act, 1966, challenged an order of the Executive Officer of the Taluk Panchayat demanding property tax on land used for market purposes. The court held that land owned by the APMC and used for market purposes is exempt from property tax under Section 199 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, as the land is used for a public purpose and the APMC is a local authority. The order was quashed. (Paras 1-10)

B) Statutory Interpretation - Doctrine of Implied Repeal - Section 199 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 vs. Karnataka Agricultural Marketing (R &

D) Act, 1966 - The court considered whether the exemption under Section 199 of the Panchayat Raj Act was impliedly repealed by the Marketing Act. It held that there is no inconsistency between the two Acts, and the exemption continues to apply. The Marketing Act does not impose property tax, and the Panchayat Raj Act provides for exemption for properties used for public purposes. (Paras 5-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the land owned by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) and used for market purposes is exempt from payment of property tax under the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, and whether the order of the Executive Officer of the Taluk Panchayat demanding property tax is valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 22.06.2022 bearing No.Tha.Pan.Gu/Gra.Pan/Chellur A.P.M.C. Dariteravu/ Vi.Va/6/2022-23/452 issued by the 1st respondent is quashed. The respondents are directed not to demand property tax from the petitioner for the land used for market purposes.

Law Points

  • Property tax exemption for agricultural produce market committees
  • Interpretation of Section 199 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act
  • 1993
  • Doctrine of implied repeal
  • Market yard land used for market purposes exempt from property tax
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

NC: 2023:KHC:45326

WP No. 13483 of 2022 (LB-RES)

2023-12-12

Suraj Govindaraj

NC: 2023:KHC:45326

Sri. Swaroop T. for petitioner; Smt. Shubha S. for R1; Sri. J.N. Naveen for R2; Sri. A.V. Gangadharappa for R6; Sri. Naveen Chandrashekar, AGA for R3 & R4

The Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Gubbi Taluk, Gubbi, Tumkur District 572216, Represented by its Secretary

1. Executive Officer, Taluk Panchayath, Gubbi Taluk, Tumkur District 572216; 2. Panchayath Development Officer, Chellur Gram Panchayath, Chellur Village, Gubbi Taluk, Tumkur District 572117; 3. Deputy Commissioner, Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Mini Vidhana Soudha, Near Post Office, Tumkur, Tumkur District 572101; 4. Thashildar, Taluk Office, Gubbi Taluk, Gubbi, Tumkur District 572216; 5. Public Grievance Redressal Authority, Bangalore Division, Jilla Panchayath, Tumkur 572102 (deleted); 6. K.B. Rangaswamaiah S/O Bettaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ: Agriculturist, R/A Kodiyala, Cheluru Hobli, Gubbi Taluk, Tumkur Dist-5772216 (impleaded)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging an order demanding property tax on land owned by an Agricultural Produce Market Committee.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 22.06.2022 issued by the 1st respondent and a writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent not to demand property tax.

Filing Reason

The 1st respondent issued an order demanding property tax on land owned by the petitioner APMC, which the petitioner claimed was exempt under Section 199 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

Issues

Whether the land owned by the APMC and used for market purposes is exempt from property tax under Section 199 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. Whether the exemption under Section 199 of the Panchayat Raj Act is impliedly repealed by the Karnataka Agricultural Marketing (R & D) Act, 1966.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the land is used for market purposes and is exempt under Section 199 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, as the APMC is a local authority and the land is used for a public purpose. Respondents argued that the exemption under Section 199 is not applicable as the Karnataka Agricultural Marketing (R & D) Act, 1966 impliedly repeals the exemption, and the APMC is not a local authority for the purposes of property tax.

Ratio Decidendi

Land owned by an Agricultural Produce Market Committee and used for market purposes is exempt from property tax under Section 199 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993, as the land is used for a public purpose and the APMC is a local authority. There is no implied repeal of this exemption by the Karnataka Agricultural Marketing (R & D) Act, 1966.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other order the order dated:22.06.2022 bearing No.Tha.Pan.Gu/Gra.Pan/Chellur A.P.M.C. Dariteravu/ Vi.Va/6/2022-23/452 issued by the 1st Respondent produced as Annexure-A; b. Issue a writ of Mandamus or direction or any other writ, to the 1st respondent not to demand property tax from the petitioner. The court held that the land owned by the APMC and used for market purposes is exempt from property tax under Section 199 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging an order dated 22.06.2022 issued by the Executive Officer of the Taluk Panchayat. The court heard the matter and delivered judgment on 12.12.2023.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993: Section 199
  • Karnataka Agricultural Marketing (R & D) Act, 1966:
  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Taluk Panchayat Order Directing APMC to Pay Property Tax on Market Yard Land. Land Owned by APMC and Used for Market Purposes is Exempt from Property Tax Under Section 199 of the Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Application for Leave to Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Acquiring Body Not a Necessary Party Under Section 18 Reference Proceedings. The court held that the Vidarbha Irrigation Developmen...