FERA APPEAL NO. 57 OF 2006
26 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "FERA appeal"
94 result(s) found
Found 94 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in FERA Repeal Case — Appeal Against Post-Repeal Adjudication Order Lies Before Appellate Tribunal Under Section 19 of FEMA, Not Special Director (Appeals) Under Section 17 of FEMA. The Court held that the saving clause in Section 49 of FEMA does not preserve the appellate forum under FERA for orders passed after repeal, and the appellate forum is determined by the date of the order.
29 Jan 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the Bombay High Court. The controversy centered on the proper...
- 266
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Application in FERA/FEMA Appeal — Limitation Period Governed by FERA Section 54, Not FEMA Section 49(5)(c). The court held that the appeal against the Appellate Tribunal's order under FEMA is governed by the limitation period under Section 54 of FERA, which is 60 days, and the High Court cannot condone delay beyond that period.
4 May 2011The Union of India, through the Directorate of Enforcement, filed a Civil Application seeking condonation of 291 days delay in filing an appeal agains...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows FERA Appeal: Tribunal Erred in Affirming Penalty for Alleged Contravention of Section 9(1)(f)(i) of FERA 1973 — Remittances Protected Under Remittances in Foreign Exchange (Immunities and Exemptions) Act, 1991 and Scheme of 1991.
5 Jul 2012The appellants, four individuals, received US$ 25,000 each in their savings bank accounts with Bank of Baroda on or about 12 October 1991, totaling US...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Enforcement Directorate Appeals in FERA Contravention Cases Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. Held that mere suspicion cannot substitute proof and that adjudication proceedings under FERA must be initiated within a reasonable time.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India through the Enforcement Directorate against orders of the Appellate Tribunal for Fore...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Preliminary Objection to Territorial Jurisdiction in FERA Appeals and Reserves Judgment on Maintainability. Court Examines Whether Appeals Under FERA Lie in Bombay High Court When Company's Registered Office and Principal Business Are in Bangalore, Despite Directors' Residence and Administrative Office in Mumbai.
12 Oct 2010The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard three appeals under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) filed by Hasmukh K Rawal, M/s. Mandl...
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears FERA Appeals Against Penalty for Non-Realisation of Export Proceeds; Considers Whether Exporter Took Reasonable Steps Under Section 18(2) FERA. Court Examines Legality of Show Cause Notice and Effect of Pending RBI Write-Off Application.
6 Sep 2012The appeals were filed under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 2000 and Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 against the order of the Appellate Tr...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging FEMA Adjudication Orders on Ground of Lack of Jurisdiction of Special Director (Appeals) to Entertain Appeals Against Orders Passed by Assistant Director Under Section 52 of FEMA, 1999. The court held that appeals under Section 52 of FEMA lie only against orders of Special Director or Additional Director, not Assistant Director, and Section 49 savings clause does not confer jurisdiction.
13 Jul 2006The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by Premier Limited, Godrej Industries Limited, A.B. Godrej, and N.B. Godrej challenging orders passed ...
- 129
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Whether an Authorised Dealer Compliant with RBI's FLM Instructions Can Be Held Liable under Sections 6(4) and 6(5) of FERA; Maintainability Not Disputed Despite Co-Noticees' Failure to Appeal.
14 Oct 2010This matter concerns two appeals filed under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) before the High Court of Bombay, challenging an order of the A...
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay hears writ petition against order rejecting preliminary objection to show cause notice under Section 49(3) of FEMA – Petitioners challenge validity of notice on limitation ground. Interpretation of 'take notice' in Section 49(3) in light of Rule 3 of Adjudication Proceedings and Appeal Rules, 1974 is central.
16 Dec 2010The dispute arose from a show cause notice issued by the Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate on 31 May 2002, calling upon Star India Private L...
- 10
