Search Results for "Expediency"

196 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 196 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Scientist Without Inquiry in Interest of Security of State. Dismissal under Article 311(2)(c) of Constitution and Rule 14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 Upheld as Procedural Safeguards Not Applicable Where Security of State is Involved.

The appellant, Dr. V.R. Sanal Kumar, was a Scientist/Engineer in the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre (VSSC), a unit of the Indian Space Research Organisa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Dispute Over Non-Compete Fee Taxability. Amount Received Under Deed of Covenant Held as Capital Receipt Not Taxable Under Section 28(ii)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961, Due to Separate Genuine Transaction and Procedural Error in High Court's Judgment.

The appeal concerned the assessment year 1995-96 involving Shri Shiv Raj Gupta, Chairman and Managing Director of Central Distillery and Breweries Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Income Tax Reassessment Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Reassessment notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as validly issued within four years from end of assessment year.

The appellant, M/s. Kanhaiyalal Dudheria, a partnership firm, filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the orders of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Application for Perjury Proceedings Against Wife in Family Court Appeal. False statements in pleadings alone do not warrant prosecution under Section 340 Cr.P.C. without proof of intentional falsehood and necessity for prosecution.

The applicant, Dr. Santosh Chandrashekar Shetty (husband), filed a Civil Application under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Disallowance of Interest Case. Tribunal's finding that assessee had sufficient interest-free funds for investments upheld, and S.A. Builders precedent on business purpose for advances to sister concerns applied.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case on Lease Rental Deduction for Idle Machinery. Business decision to keep dozers idle and pay lease rentals without use held not allowable as expenditure under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Revenue appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had allowed the assessee's claim for deduction of lease renta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal for Full Deduction of Roof Repair Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Expenditure incurred by tenant on replacement of common roof held to be revenue expenditure allowable in entirety as commercial expediency.

The appellant, Danesh A. Irani, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed an appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (IT...