Search Results for "Encumbrance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Encumbrance"

222 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 222 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Judgment Debtor and Sub Registrars for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Prohibitory Order and Communication Order in Execution Proceedings. Court Holds That Prohibitory Order Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC Does Not Create a Charge on Property and That Sub Registrars Are Not Bound by Such Orders Unless Property Is Attached.

11 Feb 2026

The petitioner, D. Chandrasekaran, represented by his power agent A. Dakshnamoorthy, filed two contempt petitions. The first, Cont.P.No.1723 of 2025, ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against Judgment Debtor and Sub Registrars for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Prohibitory Order and Communication Order in Execution Proceedings. Court Held That the Prohibitory Order Under Order 21 Rule 54 CPC Was Not Served on the Judgment Debtor and the Communication Order Was Not a Mandatory Direction, Thus No Willful Disobedience Established.

11 Feb 2026

The petitioner, A. Dakshnamoorthy, as power agent of his son D. Chandrasekaran, filed two contempt petitions. The first (Cont.P.No.1723/2025) was agai...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Sub-Registrar's Refusal to Delete Agreement of Sale Entry from Encumbrance Certificate. Sub-Registrar Has No Power to Make Entries of Unregistered Agreements of Sale Under Registration Act, 1908, and Cannot Refuse Deletion.

4 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Ramesh Timmanna Umarani, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Proved Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance as he had deposited balance consideration and issued notice, satisfying Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

6 Apr 2022

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 12.09.2007 and 20.09.2007 for suit schedule property. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Deduction of Mortgage Repayment Under Section 48(i). The court held that repayment of mortgage debt is an expenditure incurred in connection with transfer of mortgaged asset, allowable under Section 48(i) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

31 Jan 2005

The judgment involves two tax appeals, one by the revenue and one by the assessee, arising from a common issue regarding the allowability of mortgage ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Part and Assessee's Appeal on Mortgage Repayment Issue. Repayment of mortgage debt created by the assessee is an expenditure incurred in connection with the transfer of mortgaged asset allowable under Section 48(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

31 Jan 2005

The judgment involves two tax appeals, one by the revenue and one by the assessee, arising from a common issue regarding the allowability of repayment...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against SARFAESI Auction Sale for Lack of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner's challenge to auction sale of secured assets fails as remedy under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act before DRT was not exhausted.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Umang Sugars Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the auction sale of movable and immovable...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Under Specific Relief Act 1963 - Upholds Decree for Specific Performance Based on Plaintiff's Readiness and Willingness. The Court affirmed that time was not of the essence, discharge of mortgage was a condition precedent, and the plea under Order II Rule 2 CPC was not raised in the written statement and thus barred.

20 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 7 January 2019 of a Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Madras, which dismissed the secon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree Based on Oral Agreement — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With in Second Appeal. Oral Agreement for Sale of Immovable Property Proved by Evidence; Written Document Dated 31.12.1973 Did Not Supersede Earlier Oral Agreement.

3 Nov 2025

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants challenging concurrent judgments and decrees passed for specific performance of an agreement...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal, Upholds Specific Performance Decree for Oral Agreement to Sell Land. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With as Plaintiff Proved Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

3 Nov 2025

This second appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an oral agreement to sell agricultural land. The plaintiff (now represented by legal...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)