Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against SARFAESI Auction Sale for Lack of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner's challenge to auction sale of secured assets fails as remedy under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act before DRT was not exhausted.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 71
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Umang Sugars Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the auction sale of movable and immovable assets of Ghrushneshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (GSSKL) conducted by respondent No.2, the Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank Limited, under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act). The petitioner contended that the bank had taken possession of the assets and issued a tender for sale, and that the auction was illegal. The court, after hearing the parties, observed that the petitioner had an alternative efficacious remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT). The court noted that the petitioner had not availed of this remedy and that the writ petition was not maintainable. The court dismissed the petition, leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the DRT if so advised. The judgment was delivered by a division bench comprising Justices B.P. Dharmadhikari and Ravindra V. Ghuge, with the latter authoring the judgment.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Alternative Remedy - SARFAESI Act, 2002, Section 17 - The petitioner challenged the auction sale of secured assets by a cooperative bank under the SARFAESI Act without exhausting the remedy under Section 17 before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The court held that the writ petition is not maintainable as an alternative efficacious remedy exists. (Paras 1-10)

B) Securitisation - Auction Sale - Cooperative Bank - SARFAESI Act, 2002 - The petitioner, a private limited company, participated in an auction conducted by the respondent bank for the sale of assets of a sugar factory. The court noted that the petitioner's challenge to the sale could be raised before the DRT under Section 17. (Paras 3-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the writ petition challenging the auction sale of secured assets under the SARFAESI Act is maintainable when the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition dismissed. Petitioner may approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act if so advised.

Law Points

  • Alternative remedy
  • SARFAESI Act
  • Section 17
  • Writ jurisdiction
  • Auction sale
  • Secured creditor
  • Cooperative bank
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (12) 12

Writ Petition No.6331 of 2013

2013-12-10

B.P. Dharmadhikari, Ravindra V. Ghuge

Mr. V.D. Sapkal h/f Mr. Y.V. Kakade for petitioner, Mr. P.P. More for respondent No.1, Mr. S.B. Gorade Patil for respondent No.2

Umang Sugars Private Limited

The State of Maharashtra, The Maharashtra State Cooperative Bank Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging auction sale of secured assets under SARFAESI Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to challenge the auction sale conducted by respondent bank.

Filing Reason

Petitioner contended that the auction sale was illegal.

Issues

Whether the writ petition is maintainable when alternative remedy under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act is available.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the auction sale was illegal. Respondent bank argued that the petitioner has an alternative remedy under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act.

Ratio Decidendi

A writ petition challenging an auction sale under the SARFAESI Act is not maintainable when the petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy under Section 17 of the Act before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

Judgment Excerpts

Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of the parties and heard the respective advocates. The petitioner is a Private Limited Company registered under the Companies Act. Respondent No.2 is the Co-operative Bank & a Secured Creditor which has taken possession of the assets of borrower the Ghrushneshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., under the provisions of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No.6331 of 2013 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petition was reserved on 19/10/2013 and pronounced on 10/12/2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002: Section 17
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against SARFAESI Auction Sale for Lack of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner's challenge to auction sale of secured assets fails as remedy under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act before DRT was not exhausted.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging AICTE's Refusal to Issue Letter of Intent for Engineering College Due to Non-Compliance with Performance Guarantee Condition. The court held that the conditions were procedural and could be relaxed, ...