Search Results for "Division Bench clarification"

1067 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1067 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Tags Civil Appeals and Transfer Cases on Inter Se Seniority Between Direct Recruit and Promotees in Income Tax Department. Core Question is Whether Seniority of Direct Recruits Should be Based on Date of Appointment or Date of Vacancy.

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals and transfer cases concerning the inter se seniority dispute between direct recruits and pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Redevelopment Dispute. Section 37(2)(b) Appeal Fails as No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established Due to Unclear Terms and Unregistered Supplemental Agreement.

The Petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles & Developers Pvt. Ltd., a developer, filed an appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows University Appeal in Increment Dispute Under UGC Scheme. Two Advance Increments Denied to Lecturer Holding Ph.D. on Placement as Selection Grade Lecturer Upheld.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which directed the Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit to grant two advance i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction in Cessed Building Area — No Violation of DCR Found. Petitioner failed to establish that the construction violated Development Control Regulations or that the building was a cessed building under MHADA.

The petitioner, Asif Abdul Sattar, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a building by Respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...