Search Results for "Directory Requirement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Directory Requirement"

263 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 263 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

9 Oct 2014

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Councillor Under Maharashtra Local Authority Members Disqualification Act, 1986. Failure to Comply with Whip Issued by Group Leader Constitutes Defection Under Section 3(1)(a) of the Act.

26 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Avinash Mardikar, was elected as a councillor of the Amravati Municipal Corporation and appointed as group leader of a coalition (Agha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

24 Jan 2014

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Undervaluation Cases — Revisional Powers Under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Upheld. The Court held that the limitation period for suo motu revision by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority is five years from the date of the order, not from the date of registration.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Madras High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 47A of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable Due to Failure to Issue Prior Notice Under Section 34(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Held That the Requirement of Prior Notice Is Mandatory and a Condition Precedent for Filing a Section 34 Application.

19 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Abolition of Odisha Administrative Tribunal — Power to Abolish SATs Upheld Under General Clauses Act and Article 323-A. The Court held that the Union Government has the power to abolish a State Administrative Tribunal established under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, and the notification dated 2 August 2019 is valid.

21 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the Orissa High Court judgment upholding the abolition of the Odisha Administrative Tribunal (OAT). The ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Canara Bank's Appeal in Disciplinary Reversion Case — Division Bench Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review. Regulation 10 of Canara Bank Officer Employees' (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1976 is Directory, Not Mandatory.

12 May 2026

The case involves a disciplinary action taken by Appellants against its Senior Manager, Respondents, who was reduced from SMG Scale-IV to MMG Scale-II...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and no exceptional grounds were made out for interference under Article 226.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Phoenix ARC Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, acting as a trust, filed two writ petitions under Art...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court upheld the summoning of additional accused post-trial conclusion, emphasizing the High Court’s revisional powers and the necessity of fresh trials to ensure justice.

6 Mar 2025

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 319 — Summoning of Additional Accused Post-Trial Conclusion Held Valid — Reiteration of Revi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation's Land Acquisition for Road Construction Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Municipal Corporation Validly Exercised Independent Powers Under MMC Act Without Requiring Road Inclusion in Development Plan Under MRTP Act, With Public Interest Justifying Acquisition Despite Property Owners' Objections.

2 Sep 2022

The dispute originated from the Municipal Corporation of Mumbai's efforts to acquire portions of the appellants' property for constructing a link road...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)