Search Results for "Dindigul"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Dindigul"

76 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Allows Partition Appeal, Upholds 1/2 Share for Plaintiff but Modifies Decree to Include Right of Residence for Defendant. Court holds that a co-owner in possession cannot be ousted without partition by metes and bounds, and that the trial court erred in granting a preliminary decree without considering the defendant's right of residence under Section 44 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

9 Jun 2026

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 28.02.2018 passed by the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dindigul, in O.S.No.65 of 2009, a suit for partit...

High Court

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Double Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

1 Jun 2026

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by four accused persons (A1 to A4) against their conviction and sentence by the Additional District and...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar and Surveyor to Consider Representation for Survey and Demarcation of Land Held Under Joint Patta. Court Orders Consideration of Application for Separate Patta Within Eight Weeks Following Precedent in W.P(MD)No.12676 of 2024.

28 Jan 2025

The petitioner, V. Ramachandran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Cour...

High Court

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition for Lack of Wilful Disobedience, Grants Liberty to Challenge Order. Respondents complied with writ order by conducting inspection and passing final orders, hence no wilful disobedience.

24 Jan 2025

The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging wilful disobedience of an order passed by the ...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachment on Public Land in Writ of Mandamus — Representation Must Be Considered Within Three Months. Statutory Authority Has Duty to Consider Representation; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

23 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Muthulakshmi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, ...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation for Removal of Encroachment in Writ of Mandamus — Statutory Authority Must Act Within Three Months. Non-consideration of representation amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and the court directed the respondents to pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representation regarding removal of shops from Survey No.314.

23 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Muthulakshmi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court s...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Patta Cancellation Without Hearing — Violation of Natural Justice. Revenue Authority's Orders Quashed as Patta Cancellation Based on Civil Decree Ignored Pending Second Appeal and Interim Suspension Order.

9 Jan 2025

The petitioners, M.Palaniyappan and M.Manickam, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the M...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Patta Cancellation Orders for Violation of Natural Justice — Revenue Authorities Directed to Hear Petitioners Before Cancelling Patta. Court Holds That Interim Orders of Civil Court Must Be Considered by Revenue Authorities Under Section 12 of Tamil Nadu Patta Pass Book Act, 1983.

9 Jan 2025

The petitioners, M.Palaniyappan and M.Manickam, filed a writ petition before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court challenging two orders passed ...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Municipal Commissioner to Consider Representation Against Unauthorized Construction Under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 — Non-Consideration of Representation Amounts to Dereliction of Duty. The court held that a statutory authority has a duty to consider a representation on its merits and pass appropriate orders; failure to do so justifies a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioner, R. Mayilsamy, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct respondents 1 ...

High Court

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation Against Laying of State Highway in Eco-Sensitive Zone. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

6 Jan 2025

The petitioner, V. Asokan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondents ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)