Search Results for "Dilip Dahanukar"

13 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Condition of Deposit of 25% Compensation for Suspension of Sentence in Cheque Bounce Cases. Section 148 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is procedural and applies to pending appeals; condition does not violate Article 21.

The petitioner, Ajay Vinodchandra Shah, was convicted in three separate cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for cheque bou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Deposit Condition for Suspension of Sentence in NI Act Case. Court Held That Condition of Deposit of 62% of Compensation Amount Was Exorbitant and Reduced It to 20% to Protect Right of Appeal.

The petitioner, Sumeet Gupta, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and sentenced to three months' imprisonment. He...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Revision in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Modifies Condition for Suspension of Sentence. Appellate Court's Direction to Deposit Compensation Upheld but Reduced to 50% Considering Financial Hardship.

The applicant, T. Veeruswami, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by the trial court in Criminal Case No.16057 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Condition of Compensation for Suspension of Sentence in NI Act Cases. Appellate Court Cannot Impose Payment of Compensation Under Section 357(3) CrPC as Condition for Suspending Sentence Under Section 389 CrPC.

The Bombay High Court addressed three petitions raising a common legal question: whether an appellate court hearing an appeal against conviction under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Cheque Was Issued as Security, Not for Repayment of Loan.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Vyomesh Jitendra Trivedi, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held that the Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Suit for Non-Prosecution Without Considering Merits and That the Suit Was Not Abated Despite Death of Sole Proprietor as Legal Representatives Were Brought on Record.

The present appeal arises from a suit filed in 1983 by the original plaintiffs (respondents herein) against the original defendant, Bitesh Hanumantrao...