Search Results for "Demolition and reconstruction"

136 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 136 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Lays Down Pan-India Guidelines Against Demolition of Properties of Accused Without Due Process. Executive Cannot Use Demolition as Punishment for Crime; Right to Shelter Protected Under Article 21.

This batch of writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raised a grievance that residential and commercial properties of persons ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds PMC's Demolition Notices for Illegal Green Belt Constructions in Pune. Petitioners' Plea for Regularization Rejected; Costs Imposed for Violations of Environmental Regulations

The petitioners challenge the demolition notices issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) for illegal structures built in the green belt zone on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Heritage Market Buildings. Heritage Classification Does Not Bar Demolition for Public Safety Under Section 2(1ea) of Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961.

The petitioners, residents of Mysuru, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Municipal Demolition Case — High Court Cannot Direct Reconstruction of Demolished Structure. The court held that the power to demolish illegal structures is vested in the municipal corporation and courts cannot direct reconstruction even if procedure was violated.

The case involves appeals by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai against a High Court order directing reconstruction of a demolished structure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summary Eviction Order Against 80-Year-Old Tenant in MHADA Redevelopment Dispute. Petitioner's Right to Alternate Accommodation Under Section 95A of MHADA Act Upheld as Board Failed to Provide Permanent Rehabilitation Before Eviction.

The petitioner, Sugrabai Gulam Abas Tambawala, an 80-year-old housewife, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs BMC to Provide Alternate Premises to Disabled Petitioner After Illegal Demolition of Stall. License Under Section 394 of MMC Act, 1888 Does Not Authorize Structure on Public Land, but Demolition Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Mohd. Sayed Mohd. Salim Nagori Rizvi, a person with 100% hearing disability, filed a writ petition seeking reconstruction of his stall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Demolition of Bungalow Without Notice Under Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Demolition Without Prior Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal and Violative of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, M/s Asian Rubber Works and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the illegal demo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Dilapidated Building, Directs LIC to Reconstruct with Tenant Accommodation. The court held that the building was unsafe and required demolition, but LIC must provide alternative accommodation to tenants during reconstruction.

The judgment concerns a writ petition filed by tenants of the General Assurance Building in Mumbai, challenging a notice issued under Section 354 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Reconstruction of Servant Quarters in Cantonment Area. Reconstruction Without Prior Sanction Under Section 238 of Cantonments Act, 2006 Constitutes Unauthorized Construction Justifying Demolition Under Section 248(1).

The petitioner, an occupant of residential premises within the Pune Cantonment Board limits, obtained sanction for building plans on 6 May 2008 under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.

The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...