Search Results for "Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal"

358 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 358 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Limitation Dispute — Application Under Section 7 Held Barred by Limitation. Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets Does Not Extend Limitation for Initiating CIRP Under IBC.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Babulal Vardharji Gurjar, a director of Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd., against the order of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.

30 Jul 2013

The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Lack of Financial Creditor Status. Interest-Free Term Loan Does Not Qualify as Financial Debt Under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 as It Lacks Consideration for Time Value of Money.

26 Jul 2021

The appeal arose under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) against the dismissal by the National Company Law Appellate Tribun...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part on Operational Creditor Status but Upholds Dismissal on Limitation in Insolvency Case. The court held that a purchaser does not qualify as an operational creditor under Section 5(20) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the application under Section 9 was barred by limitation due to debt arising from 2013 transactions.

4 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against SARFAESI Proceedings Due to Non-Compliance with Section 18(1) Second Proviso — Debt Recovery Tribunal Failed to Consider Borrower's Application Before Issuing Recovery Certificate. The court held that the DRT must decide an application for waiver or reduction of the pre-deposit under Section 18(1) second proviso of the SARFAESI Act before entertaining the appeal or issuing a recovery certificate.

8 Oct 2013

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actions of secured creditors under the S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Appoint Court Receiver Under Section 17 of Arbitration Act. Court Receiver is an Officer of the High Court Subject Only to Chief Justice's Supervision.

16 Mar 2017

The Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay filed a Report seeking directions on whether the Registry should accept matters where an Arbitral Tribunal appo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Limitation Bar — Winding Up Petition Filed Beyond Three Years from Default Date Cannot Be Revived Under IBC. The Court held that a time-barred winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 cannot be treated as a valid Section 7 application under the IBC, and the filing of a suit for specific performance does not extend limitation for a winding up petition.

25 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals arising from the admission of a winding up petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The pet...

High Court

Supreme Court Upholds Financial Creditor in Insolvency Petition Based on Balance Sheet Acknowledgement Under Limitation Act. The Court held that entries in signed balance sheets constitute acknowledgement of debt under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963, extending the limitation period for applications under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and that defects in the application regarding the date of default are curable.

15 Apr 2021

The dispute arose from an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) filed by Asset Reconstruction Company (India) ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Pre-Deposit Requirement Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act in Appeals by Borrowers and Secured Creditors. The court held that pre-deposit is mandatory, computed based on the amount claimed in the notice under Section 13(2), excluding future interest, with adjustments for recoveries after filing the petition under Section 17.

23 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in a group of appeals, addressed the interpretation of Section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial As...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

13 Oct 2011

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)