Search Results for "DRAT"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "DRAT"

102 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Allowing One Time Settlement in Debt Recovery Case — Interest Must Be Calculated as Per OTS Terms. The court held that the DRT erred in not giving effect to the OTS and in calculating interest beyond the OTS terms, and the DRAT correctly set aside the DRT order.

10 Jul 2019

The petitioners, Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) and India SME Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., challenged an order dated 26th Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Debt Recovery Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioner failed to deposit amount as directed, and no grounds for review were made out.

5 Feb 2016

The petitioner, M/s MRB Roadconst. Pvt. Ltd., filed a Review Petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an order dated 10th June 2015 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRAT Order Confirming Sale of Company Property in Favour of Auction Purchaser. Workers' Dues and Alleged Irregularities Do Not Justify Annulment of Concluded Auction Sale Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

20 Sep 2011

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Pre-Deposit Requirement Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act in Appeals by Borrowers and Secured Creditors. The court held that pre-deposit is mandatory, computed based on the amount claimed in the notice under Section 13(2), excluding future interest, with adjustments for recoveries after filing the petition under Section 17.

23 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court of India, in a group of appeals, addressed the interpretation of Section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial As...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Guarantors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Enforcement Case, Upholding Sale of Mortgaged Properties. The Court held that multiple litigations by guarantors constitute abuse of process and cannot defeat the expeditious recovery mechanism under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

23 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India dealt with civil appeals arising from special leave petitions challenging a common judgment of the Madras High Court. The d...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside DRAT Pre-Deposit Condition in SARFAESI Appeal — Petitioner Granted Relief Without Pre-Deposit. The Court held that the DRAT's power to waive or reduce pre-deposit under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act is discretionary and must be exercised judiciously, and that the condition of depositing 25% of the debt amount was onerous and disproportionate.

1 Jul 2020

The petitioner, M/s. Sanjeevini Drug House, a proprietorship concern, had availed credit facilities from Kavery Grameena Bank (respondent No.1). Upon ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRAT Order Requiring Pre-Deposit Under Section 21 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 — Waiver of Deposit Not Justified as Petitioner Failed to Establish Irreparable Hardship.

22 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Continental Construction Limited, was a defendant in a recovery suit filed by the Export Import Bank of India (Exim Bank) in the Debt ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under RDDB Act, 1993, and Arbitration Clause Cannot Oust It.

8 Mar 2016

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Harvestdeal Securities Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Arbitration Clause Does Not Oust Jurisdiction of DRT Under Section 19 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

8 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Harvestdeal Securities Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 19 February 2015, which set asid...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Matter with Heavy Costs. Petitioners' attempt to redeem mortgaged property for a fraction of the outstanding debt held to be an abuse of process.

10 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Mr. Dipak Digambar Naik and others, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 12th March 2015 passed ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)