Search Results for "Customs tariff"

311 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 311 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Denial of Exemption for Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty under Section 8C of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Petitioner Asserts Notification No.96/2009-Cus. Intended to Exempt All Safeguard Duties and Phrase 'under section 8B' is Discriminatory.

The petitioner, a public limited company manufacturing pneumatic tyres, regularly imported Carbon Black from the People’s Republic of China. Carbon ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Duty Exemption Case - Cess Under Textile Committees Act Not Part of CVD. Cess under Section 5 of Textile Committees Act, 1963 is not includable in Countervailing Duty under Section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 for exemption purposes.

The appellant, M/s. Shree Rajasthan Texchem Limited, a manufacturer of yarn, imported capital goods (textile machinery) under bills of entry dated 28t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Customs Classification Disputes Over LCD Panels. LCD Panels Classified Under Chapter Heading 9013.8010 as Liquid Crystal Devices, Not as Parts of Television Sets or Car Audio Systems Under General Headings.

The appeals involved disputes over the customs classification of imported LCD panels by two assessees, M/s Videocon International and M/S Harman Inter...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue Appeals and Allows Assessee Appeals in Customs and Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of goods under Customs Tariff and Central Excise Tariff determined based on technical literature and expert opinion, rejecting revenue's reclassification.

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise and by M/s Twenty First Century Wire Rods Ltd. The core i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition Seeking Reassessment of Customs Duty Due to Typographical Error in Customs Tariff Heading. Petitioner's Inadvertent Error in Declaring CTH 85176990 Instead of 85176930 for Routers Entitles Correction Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Dimension Data India Private Ltd., an importer, filed five Bills of Entry between 15.03.2019 and 25.04.2019 for importing 48 units of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Assessment and Out-of-Charge Order for Imported Goods. Customs Authorities Directed to Process Bill of Entry and Allow Clearance Under Correct Tariff Heading.

The petitioner, Cisco Commerce India Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus directing the customs auth...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Vessels Imported Prior to Notification. Condition No.82 of Notification 12/2012-Cus. Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Vessels Imported Before Its Effective Date.

The petitioner, The Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd., imported two vessels, 'Jag Rishi' and 'Jag Rahul', prior to 17.03.2012. On 17.03.2012, the Ce...