Search Results for "Customs Tariff Heading"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Customs Tariff Heading"

90 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 90 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Coconut Oil Classification Dispute — Holds Pure Coconut Oil in Small Packings Classifiable as Hair Oil Under Heading 3305. The Court applied Section Note 2 and Chapter Note 3 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, ruling that packaging for retail sale as hair oil overrides classification as edible oil under Heading 1513.

13 Dec 2024

The case involved appeals by the Revenue (Commissioner of Central Excise) against M/s. Madhan Agro Industries (India) Private Ltd. concerning the clas...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Power Developer in Mega Power Policy Customs Duty Exemption Dispute — Press Release Not a Binding Policy Change. The court held that a Press Release reducing the capacity threshold for Mega Power Projects from 1000 MW to 700 MW did not create a binding right to customs duty exemption under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962, and the appellant had assumed the risk of policy changes under the RFP.

20 Nov 2024

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) dated 30.06.2014, which dismissed the appeal of Nabha Power Limited...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Customs Classification Disputes Over LCD Panels. LCD Panels Classified Under Chapter Heading 9013.8010 as Liquid Crystal Devices, Not as Parts of Television Sets or Car Audio Systems Under General Headings.

29 Mar 2023

The appeals involved disputes over the customs classification of imported LCD panels by two assessees, M/s Videocon International and M/S Harman Inter...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Settlement Commission in Customs Duty Case — Petitioner's Full Disclosure and Cooperation Justifies Settlement. Settlement Commission's Rejection of Application for Non-Disclosure of Additional Amounts Set Aside as Unreasonable Under Section 127B of Customs Act, 1962.

15 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of vehicles in India. It filed four applications before the Settlement Commiss...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Classifies Car Matting as Carpet Under Chapter 57 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. HSN Explanatory Notes and Specific Description Principle Applied to Hold That Car Matting Is More Specifically Described as Carpet Than as Motor Vehicle Accessory.

1 May 2020

The case involved two appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III against a common decision of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Importer in Customs Classification and Valuation Dispute — Head End Equipment Classified Under CTH 8543 8999 and Software/Service Charges Included in Assessable Value. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding that the imported goods constituted a complete functional unit and that the appellant's mis-declaration of classification and value justified penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962.

27 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. against the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case: Commissioner's Decision on Nil Duty Binding on Assessing Officer. Duty on DTA Clearances of Fresh Mushrooms by 100% EOU Held Nil Following Commissioner's Order Under Section 3(1) of Central Excise Act, 1944.

14 Dec 2012

The appellant, ECO Valley Farms & Foods Limited, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in cultivation, manufacture, and export of fresh/processed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Without Pre-deposit in Classification Dispute — Tribunal's Discretion Must Be Exercised Consistently. Pre-deposit direction set aside as Tribunal failed to follow its own earlier order on identical issue under Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962.

25 Nov 2010

The appellant, Videocon Industries Ltd., a manufacturer of LCD TVs, had been regularly importing Liquid Crystal Device – Thin Film Transistor Module...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute. n-Hexane Held to be a Separate Chemical Compound, Not Petroleum Oil, Under Customs Tariff Heading 2901.10 and Central Excise Tariff Heading 2901.90.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Customs, Kandla, against the decision of CESTAT, Ahmedabad, which had dismissed the Revenue's appea...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)