Search Results for "Contractual dispute"

1338 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1338 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Deemed Conveyance under MOFA Cannot Be Set Aside Merely on Technical Objections When Developer Fails to Execute Conveyance – Bombay High Court

The dispute arose when a cooperative housing society sought deemed conveyance of the land and building from the developer who had failed to execute th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Judicial Review of State Actions in Contractual Disputes: Evolution and Current Scope. From Traditional Boundaries to Modern Oversight: Ensuring Fairness and Transparency in State Contractual Matters

The evolution of judicial review in India regarding state actions in contractual and tender disputes. Historically, such disputes were seen as private...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Dispute Over Contractual Service Counting. Services Rendered as Casual/Contractual Cannot Be Treated as Temporary for Qualifying Service Under Rule 13 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Absent Statutory Scheme Provision.

The dispute arose from a claim for pensionary benefits by an employee who served as a casual/contractual General Assistant from 1985 until her regular...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds International Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute — Damages Awarded for Breach of Contract. Division Bench of Delhi High Court Erred in Setting Aside Majority Award Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Findings Were Plausible and Not Perverse.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against a Division Bench judgment of the Delhi High Court that had set aside a majority international arbit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Contractual Employee for Maternity Benefit under Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. Denial of maternity benefit to a woman on contractual basis held unconstitutional and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Archana Dahifale, was employed as a Project Officer on a contractual basis with the respondent No.2 Institute since 2015. Her contract...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Permanency for Apprentice Development Officers of LIC. Apprenticeship Training Scheme under Section 18 of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 does not create employer-employee relationship or right to absorption.

The petitioners, a group of individuals who were engaged as apprentice development officers by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under a t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Permanency for LIC Apprentices — Apprentices Act, 1961 Overrides Industrial Disputes Act. Apprentices engaged under a statutory scheme are not employees and have no right to absorption.

The petitioners, engaged as apprentices by the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under the Apprentices Act, 1961, filed writ petitions seeking...