Search Results for "Container"

294 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 294 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award Upholding Forfeiture of Security Deposit and Detention of Equipment in Contract Dispute. Termination of Contract for Poor Performance and Failure to Transport Export Container Held Justified Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from a dispute between M/s Vijay Trading and Transport Company (appellant) and Central Warehousing Corporation (respondent) concernin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Inquiry Officer's Penalty Order for Lack of Jurisdiction in Misdescription of Cargo Case. Container Corporation of India's Inquiry Officer acted without authority under the Indian Railways Act, 1989 and the Railways (Punitive Charges for Misdescription of Goods) Rules, 2004.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from an order dated 10.09.2012 passed by an Inquiry Officer, Shri Srinivas Mudgerikar, appointed by the H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Award of Container Terminal Contract to PSA International. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any public interest or mala fides in the tender process for the 4th Container Terminal at JNPT.

The petitioner, Mandar Narhari Parab, claiming to be a journalist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Assessee Had Made Full Disclosure in Return and Notes.

The petitioner, NYK Line (India) Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of a non-resident shipping line, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2006-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds 60 Years Retirement Age for Workmen Under Model Standing Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Reduction of Retirement Age from 60 to 58 Years Held Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal and Cross Objection against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...