Search Results for "Concealment of Income"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Concealment of Income"

5 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty for Concealment of Income in Income Tax Reference. Minimum penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 sustained for suppression of net profit of Rs.9,11,521/-.

22 Aug 2017

The case pertains to an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from proceedings for the Assessment Year 1987-8...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reassessment Order and Penalty in Income Tax Reference — Limitation Period and Show-Cause Notice Validity Upheld. The court held that the reassessment order for assessment year 1959-60 was within limitation under Section 153(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the penalty notice under Section 271(1)(c) was valid despite use of 'etc' and 'or'.

24 Nov 2015

The case is an Income Tax Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from proceedings against M/s R. B. Shreeram Durgaprasad,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Not Leviable Where Assessee's Method of Accounting Was Not Accepted but No Concealment or Inaccurate Particulars Found. The court held that mere rejection of the method of accounting does not attract penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; the Revenue must establish concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars.

22 Sep 2015

The Revenue appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 21.11.2014, which had dismissed the Revenue's appeal and uphe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Cannot Be Imposed When Assessment Appeal Is Pending on Substantial Questions of Law. The court held that when the assessment order is under challenge and the appeal has been admitted on substantial questions of law, the issue is debatable and penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be imposed.

3 Mar 2015

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Assessee's Claim of Ignorance of Law Not Sufficient to Delete Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c). Deemed Dividend Addition Under Section 2(22)(e) Upheld; Penalty Restored as Assessee, a Partner in Real Estate Firm and Major Shareholder, Could Not Claim Bona Fide Mistake.

30 Mar 2010

The Revenue appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had deleted a penalty of Rs.10,08,400/- imposed under Section 271(1)...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)